Federal gun prosecutions in Omaha, NE can bring a second wave of exposure to an existing criminal case. Beyond the underlying accusation, you may face additional prison time, sentences that must run back-to-back, seizure of firearms, and restrictions that follow you for years. The ATF and federal prosecutors often use firearm charges to strengthen cases involving drug trafficking, conspiracy, robbery, and violent offenses.
Federal prosecutors do not always need to prove that a weapon was fired, brandished, or even carried. A case may rest on alleged possession, access to a firearm, a purchase made for another person, inaccurate information on federal paperwork, or the ownership of a regulated weapon. In Omaha, NE, those allegations can substantially increase the punishment tied to a separate federal offense.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
100+ Years
When federal agents and prosecutors set their sights on someone in Omaha, NE, Combs Waterkotte is prepared to push back. Our federal criminal defense team serving Omaha, NE looks beyond the fact that a gun was found and asks the questions that can change a case: Who knew it was there? Who could control it? Was the search lawful? Can the government actually connect it to the alleged crime?
Maybe agents have already searched your property. Maybe someone close to you has been questioned. Maybe a target letter just landed in your hands. Whatever tipped you off, do not ignore it. Reach out to Combs Waterkotte or call (314) 900-HELP before speaking with investigators or making a move that cannot be undone.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
Below, we explain:
- Why some gun cases are prosecuted federally instead of by the state
- How to respond if agents, subpoenas, or a target letter signal an investigation
- Possession, trafficking, straw purchase, NFA, and related firearm offenses
- The penalties that can be added to another federal sentence
- How prior convictions can trigger ACCA exposure
- When to bring in a federal firearm defense attorney
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
What Makes a Gun Charge Federal?
Not every federal gun case begins with federal agents at the door. Many start as ordinary state arrests before a task force or U.S. Attorney’s Office steps in. That can happen when the alleged conduct fits a federal offense under the Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal firearms law. Once that happens, the case moves onto a very different playing field.
Common reasons a firearm case enters federal court include:
- The government claims the firearm crossed state or national boundaries
- The accused allegedly could not lawfully possess a firearm
- The gun was found during a drug, robbery, conspiracy, or violent crime investigation
- The case involves suspected trafficking, unlicensed sales, straw purchasing, or smuggling
- The weapon is a machine gun, silencer, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or destructive device
- Identifying marks or serial numbers were allegedly removed or changed
- The alleged offense took place within federal jurisdiction
- Federal agents connect the firearm to a larger criminal operation
By the time a person learns about the investigation, agents may already have collected surveillance footage, phone records, social media posts, witness statements, firearm traces, and forensic evidence.
What Should You Do If You’re Under Investigation for a Federal Gun Crime in Omaha, NE?
You may need a lawyer long before formal charges appear. Once ATF agents begin asking questions or executing warrants, the investigation may already be well underway. This is not the moment to improvise, explain, or hope the problem disappears on its own.
Protect yourself by doing the following:
- Do not speak with federal agents without a federal firearms attorney in Omaha, NE. You have the right to remain silent. Even truthful statements can be misunderstood or used against you later.
- Do not consent to additional searches. If agents have a warrant, do not interfere, but you are not required to give permission for searches beyond the warrant’s scope.
- Preserve potential evidence. Keep text messages, emails, receipts, firearm purchase records, photographs, and other documents that may help explain what happened. Do not delete or destroy anything.
- Avoid discussing the investigation with others. Phone calls, text messages, emails, and social media posts can become evidence. Conversations with friends, family members, or potential witnesses may also be scrutinized.
- Contact a federal criminal defense lawyer in Omaha, NE immediately. Early representation can protect your rights, prevent unnecessary mistakes, and allow your attorney to communicate with investigators on your behalf.
Federal Weapons Charges You May Face in Omaha, NE
Unlawful Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)
Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), several categories of people are prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition.
Prohibited persons may include:
- A prior conviction carrying a possible sentence of more than one year
- Fugitive status
- Unlawful use of controlled substances
- A qualifying domestic violence restraining order
- A conviction for certain domestic violence offenses
- Dishonorable discharge or certain immigration statuses
A conviction ordinarily requires more than showing that a gun was nearby. The government generally must prove knowing possession and that the accused knew they belonged to the category that prohibited possession.
The government may try to prove possession in either of two ways:
- Actual possession: The accused allegedly carried the firearm or had it physically on their body.
- Constructive possession: The accused allegedly knew where the gun was and had both the power and intent to exercise control over it.
A gun found under the same roof is not automatically possessed by everyone inside. When several people use the home, vehicle, room, or container where the weapon was recovered, the government’s control-and-knowledge theory may be open to challenge.
Using, Carrying, or Possessing a Gun Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
A firearm allegation can become its own criminal count when it is tied to certain drug or violent offenses. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), prosecutors may charge a person with using or carrying a gun during a qualifying offense or possessing one to advance that offense.
Because these penalties are typically consecutive, the firearm count can add the following time after the sentence for the underlying crime:
- Five years or more when a firearm was possessed, used, or carried
- Seven years or more when the weapon was allegedly displayed or brandished
- Ten years or more when the gun was fired
- Substantially greater exposure for specially regulated firearms and devices
The prosecution may describe a firearm as a tool of the alleged offense even when it stayed hidden or untouched. That argument commonly relies on its location near:
- Controlled substances
- Large amounts of currency
- Baggies, scales, or packaging supplies
- Ledgers, customer lists, or distribution records
- Other items prosecutors associate with drug sales
A gun near drugs is not automatically a gun possessed “in furtherance” of trafficking. The defense may dispute knowledge, accessibility, ownership, proximity, and whether the firearm had any meaningful relationship to the alleged crime.
Straw Purchasing a Firearm
Federal prosecutors may allege a straw purchase when the person completing the transaction is accused of buying the gun on behalf of someone else. The case may involve the “actual transferee/buyer” question on ATF Form 4473, along with charges under 18 U.S.C. § 932.
The government and defense may focus on:
- Payment apps, cash withdrawals, or reimbursements
- Who researched, requested, or picked out the firearm
- The buyer’s plan before entering the store
- Whether the gun was genuinely purchased as a gift
- Whether the eventual recipient was prohibited or intended to use the firearm unlawfully
These cases leave a digital and documentary trail. Prosecutors may rely on Form 4473, receipts, cash transfers, text conversations, security footage, firearm tracing records, and interview statements to argue who the real buyer was.
Transporting or Transferring Firearms Unlawfully
18 U.S.C. § 933 prohibits certain transfers, transportation, or receipt of firearms when the accused knows or has reasonable cause to believe the firearm will be used, possessed, or transferred unlawfully.
A trafficking investigation may involve guns that were:
- Supplying guns to prohibited recipients
- Moving firearms across state lines as part of a broader operation
- Providing weapons for alleged drug trafficking or violent conduct
- Using several purchasers to avoid detection
- Operating what prosecutors view as an unlicensed resale business
- Sending firearms outside the United States unlawfully
When Private Gun Sales Become Federal Charges
The legal line between a private seller and an unlicensed firearms dealer depends on the surrounding facts. Federal law generally requires an FFL when someone is engaged in firearm sales as a business, but it does not convert every personal transfer into a federal crime.
There is no single fact that settles the issue. Investigators may review:
- The number and frequency of sales
- How quickly firearms were resold after purchase
- Whether the accused advertised firearms for sale
- Customer communications and payment records
- Whether transactions were intended to produce a profit
- Whether the accused maintained firearm inventory
Lying on a Federal Firearm Purchase Form
A knowingly false answer given during a firearm transaction can lead to federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) if the information mattered to whether the dealer could lawfully complete the sale.
Examples of information prosecutors may claim was falsified include:
- Who was actually purchasing the gun
- Whether the buyer had a disqualifying criminal record
- Current or recent controlled-substance use
- Domestic violence convictions or restraining orders
- Immigration classification or citizenship
- Where the person lived or whether the identification was accurate
A discrepancy is not the end of the story. Defense counsel may argue that the accused misunderstood the question, relied on incorrect information, did not knowingly lie, or gave an answer that did not affect whether the firearm could be sold.
Possessing a Gun With a Removed Serial Number
Federal law restricts the knowing possession, receipt, or transportation of certain firearms whose serial numbers have been changed, removed, or made unreadable. The relevant regulation appears at 27 CFR § 478.34.
The serial number itself is only part of the case. Other issues include:
- Whether the accused knew the serial number had been altered
- Whether the markings meet the statutory definition
- Whether forensic testing can recover the original number
- Whether the government can connect the accused to the firearm
A firearm with a removed or changed serial number may add another rung to the sentencing ladder through a federal guideline enhancement.
“Ghost Gun” Investigations
Not every homemade firearm violates federal law. The legal trouble often comes from who possessed it, whether it was made or sold as part of a business, whether required markings were present, or whether the gun was tied to separate criminal conduct.
A privately made firearm case may turn on:
- The accused person’s legal ability to possess guns
- Whether the firearm was assembled lawfully
- Any later sale, transfer, or distribution
- Evidence of commercial manufacturing or dealing
- Missing, incomplete, or altered identifying marks
- An alleged connection to trafficking, drugs, or violent crime
Unserialized firearms may bring an additional sentencing problem, particularly when the federal guidelines call for an enhancement.
Charges Involving Machine Guns, Silencers, and Short-Barreled Firearms
The National Firearms Act imposes registration, taxation, manufacturing, and transfer requirements on certain weapons and devices.
Weapons and devices commonly regulated by the NFA include:
- Machine guns
- Short-barreled rifles
- Short-barreled shotguns
- Silencers and suppressors
- Destructive devices
- Certain weapons classified as “any other weapon”
Charges may involve possessing an unregistered weapon, illegally manufacturing or transferring one, or possessing a firearm with required identifying information removed. A conviction can carry up to 10 years in federal prison, fines, and forfeiture.
Potential Punishment for Federal Weapons Offenses in Omaha, NE
Federal firearm penalties depend on the specific statute, the type of weapon, the accused’s criminal history, whether another offense was involved, and how the United States Sentencing Guidelines apply.
| Charge or Allegation | Maximum or Mandatory Penalty |
|---|---|
| Possession by a prohibited person under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) | A possible 15-year maximum, unless qualifying prior convictions trigger the Armed Career Criminal Act’s mandatory minimum |
| Using, carrying, or possessing a gun in furtherance of another federal crime | Five years or more added to the underlying sentence, with seven years for brandishing and 10 years for firing the weapon |
| Buying a firearm for another person under § 932 | Potentially 15 years in federal prison, or 25 years when the alleged circumstances involve certain intended serious crimes |
| Trafficking firearms to prohibited or unlawful recipients | A possible sentence of as much as 15 years |
| Dealing firearms without a required federal license | A possible federal sentence of as much as five years |
| False statements on firearm purchase paperwork | As much as a decade in federal custody |
| Knowing possession of a gun with a removed or changed serial number | Up to five years in many cases, with further sentencing exposure through an enhancement |
| National Firearms Act violations | A possible 10-year prison term, financial penalties, and loss of the weapon |
| Possessing or transferring a prohibited automatic weapon | A possible 10-year sentence on the machine gun charge alone, with more severe consequences if § 924(c) or another enhancement applies |
The final sentencing picture is assembled from several moving parts. The charge itself matters, but so do the quantity and characteristics of the firearms, the defendant’s record, any required minimum term, and the guideline calculations used in federal court.
Additional penalties and long-term consequences may include:
- Large financial penalties
- A term of federal supervised release following incarceration
- Seizure and forfeiture of guns, ammunition, cash, vehicles, and other alleged proceeds or instrumentalities
- Permanent or long-term restrictions on possessing firearms
- Barriers involving jobs, housing opportunities, and professional credentials
- Removal, inadmissibility, or other immigration problems for noncitizens
A federal sentence is not typically cut short through parole. Although some prisoners can earn good-conduct credit, federal incarceration generally means serving the great majority of the term imposed.
The 15-Year Armed Career Criminal Enhancement
For some defendants, the biggest battle is not whether § 922(g) applies, but whether the government can trigger the ACCA. That designation replaces the ordinary sentencing range with a mandatory minimum term of 15 years.
ACCA may apply to a person convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) who has three qualifying prior convictions involving violent felonies, serious drug crimes, or some combination of the two, so long as the offenses occurred on different occasions.
Prior convictions do not count merely because prosecutors call them violent or serious. Courts may need to dissect the elements of the earlier statute, examine a limited set of judicial records, and apply federal appellate and Supreme Court decisions that continue to shape ACCA law.
Defense counsel may attack the enhancement by examining:
- Whether the statute of conviction is broader than ACCA’s federal definition
- Whether the government can prove the specific subsection or elements involved
- The timing, location, and relationship between the alleged prior offenses
- Vacatur, expungement, pardon, or other relief affecting a conviction
- Any restoration of civil and firearm rights
When three qualifying convictions are required, knocking out one may knock out the entire 15-year mandatory minimum. That can completely reshape the sentencing landscape.
How Sentencing Enhancements Can Increase a Federal Gun Sentence
Avoiding a mandatory minimum does not necessarily mean avoiding a lengthy sentence. Federal judges begin by calculating the advisory guideline range, and enhancements can dramatically increase that recommendation.
Guideline enhancements may be tied to claims involving:
- Large numbers of firearms
- Stolen weapons
- Altered or obliterated serial numbers
- Trafficking-related conduct
- Machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, or similar regulated weapons
- Firearm possession connected to another felony
- Reckless endangerment while fleeing
- Acting as an organizer or leader
- Obstruction of justice allegations
Federal judges are not required to impose the guideline sentence, but they must begin by calculating it. A defense lawyer can object to enhancements, develop mitigation, seek a downward variance or departure, and explain why a shorter sentence is sufficient under the law.
When Should You Contact a Federal Firearms Defense Lawyer?
You should contact a federal defense lawyer in Omaha, NE as soon as you believe an investigation may involve you. You do not need to wait for an arrest or indictment.
Possible indicators of a federal investigation include:
- Federal agents ask to interview you
- Your home, vehicle, or business is searched pursuant to a warrant
- A friend, family member, or coworker is served with a subpoena
- Investigators seize guns, electronic devices, documents, or financial records
- You receive a target letter from federal prosecutors
- Someone allegedly connected to the investigation is arrested
- Your state criminal case suddenly stalls or disappears without explanation
- You hear that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is reviewing the matter
The earlier a defense attorney becomes involved, the more options may exist. Depending on the circumstances, counsel can handle communications with investigators, help avoid unnecessary interviews, identify constitutional issues, preserve evidence, assess the strength of the government’s case, and present mitigating information before prosecutors decide whether to seek an indictment.
Call Combs Waterkotte About Your Federal Gun Case
Federal firearm cases move quickly and carry enormous consequences. Combs Waterkotte represents people in Omaha, NE and nationwide, drawing on the insight of former prosecutors who understand federal investigations, charging decisions, and courtroom strategy.
Our defense begins with a hard look at how the case was built. That may mean attacking an unlawful search, exposing weaknesses in witness testimony, disputing possession, and fighting guideline enhancements that could add years to the sentence.
Some cases should be resolved through negotiation. Others demand a courtroom fight. We prepare for both, so every decision is based on strategy rather than pressure.
Our firm brings decades of combined defense experience, an in-house investigator, and a history of handling severe state and federal allegations. We have the personnel and resources to defend firearm cases at every stage, including investigation, indictment, trial, sentencing, and appeal.
If you are under investigation or have been charged with a federal gun offense, don’t wait to protect your rights. Contact us online or call (314) 900-HELP today to discuss your case with an experienced Omaha, NE federal gun charges lawyer.
