A federal firearm case in Indianapolis, IN rarely stays confined to the gun itself. One allegation can trigger mandatory prison terms, add time to another sentence, put your firearms at risk of forfeiture, and affect your rights long after the case ends. ATF agents and the U.S. Attorney’s Office frequently pursue these charges as part of broader investigations involving drug trafficking, federal conspiracy, robbery, or violent crimes.
You can face a federal gun charge without ever pulling a trigger. The government may focus instead on where the firearm was found, who could control it, how it was purchased, whether registration rules were followed, or what was written on a purchase form. Once attached to another case in Indianapolis, IN, a firearm count can become the part that drives the sentence.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte represents clients in Indianapolis, IN when a federal firearm investigation puts their freedom and future on the line. Our federal criminal defense attorneys serving Indianapolis, IN dig into the government’s theory from every angle, including where the gun was found, who allegedly controlled it, how officers obtained the evidence, and whether the weapon had any real connection to another offense.
You should not wait for an indictment to start protecting yourself. If ATF agents have contacted you, you have received a federal target letter, or you believe an arrest or charge is on the horizon, call (314) 900-HELP or contact Combs Waterkotte online. Early decisions often set the board for everything that follows.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
This guide addresses:
- What makes a gun charge a federal offense
- What to do if you’re under federal investigation
- Common federal firearm charges
- Mandatory minimums and sentencing enhancements
- The Armed Career Criminal Act
- When to hire a federal gun charges lawyer
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
What Makes a Gun Charge Federal?
The line between a state gun case and a federal prosecution is not always obvious. A case may cross that line because of the weapon involved, the accused person’s legal status, the location of the alleged conduct, or a claimed connection to interstate commerce. Violations of the Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal statute may give the U.S. government authority to prosecute. Local agencies can also refer cases upward when they want federal prosecutors to pursue harsher consequences.
Federal prosecutors may become involved if:
- A prohibited person allegedly possessed a gun or ammunition
- The weapon allegedly traveled in or affected interstate or foreign commerce
- The firearm was supposedly used, carried, or kept in connection with another federal crime
- The investigation concerns illegal sales, straw buyers, trafficking networks, or cross-border smuggling
- The gun falls into a specially regulated category under federal law
- Authorities discover a defaced or missing serial number
- The incident happened on federal property or during another federal investigation
- The government believes the weapon played a role in organized criminal activity
The first sign of trouble may come late in the investigation. Agents may already have traced the gun, interviewed witnesses, reviewed online activity, pulled phone data, and gathered physical evidence before the accused knows federal prosecutors are involved.
How to Protect Yourself During an ATF Investigation in Indianapolis, IN
Federal investigations usually develop quietly. If agents have reached out, searched your property, questioned someone close to you, or asked you to “clear a few things up,” assume the case is already moving. You should treat every conversation and decision as part of the defense.
Protect yourself by doing the following:
- Do not try to talk your way out of it. Federal agents are trained interviewers, and even an accurate answer can be taken out of context or compared against other evidence. Tell them you want a federal gun charges attorney in Indianapolis, IN, then stop answering questions.
- Respect the warrant without surrendering extra ground. Never interfere with a lawful search, but do not sign consent forms or casually authorize agents to search beyond what the warrant permits.
- Preserve records that may tell your side of the story. That may include firearm receipts, transfer documents, text messages, emails, photos, location records, and communications with sellers or buyers.
- Do not contact witnesses or codefendants about the investigation. A message meant to “get everyone on the same page” can be interpreted as witness tampering or obstruction.
- Get legal representation before the government makes the next move. Early intervention may give your attorney time to investigate, preserve favorable evidence, communicate with prosecutors, and prepare for a search, arrest, or indictment.
Common Federal Gun Charges in Indianapolis, IN
Unlawful Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)
Federal law does not limit unlawful-possession charges to people with felony convictions. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) identifies several groups of people who may not legally possess a firearm or ammunition.
Prohibited persons may include:
- Individuals with certain felony or felony-level convictions
- People accused of fleeing to avoid prosecution
- People considered unlawful users of illegal drugs or other controlled substances
- Individuals covered by certain domestic protection orders
- People convicted of qualifying misdemeanor domestic violence crimes
- Some noncitizens and former service members who received dishonorable discharges
Prosecutors generally must establish that the accused knowingly possessed the firearm or ammunition and knew of the status that made possession unlawful.
Federal firearm possession is commonly divided into two categories:
- Actual possession: The firearm was allegedly found directly on the person.
- Constructive possession: The person allegedly knew the firearm was present and had the ability and intention to control it.
Constructive possession can become the fault line of the case when a firearm is recovered from a place multiple people could access, such as a shared residence, borrowed car, hotel room, or common storage area.
Possessing a Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Crime or Crime of Violence
A gun found in the orbit of another federal case can dramatically raise the stakes. Section 924(c) creates a separate offense for certain firearm conduct connected to qualifying drug trafficking or violent crimes.
A § 924(c) sentence is generally stacked on top of the punishment for the underlying crime rather than served at the same time:
- A five-year minimum for qualifying possession, use, or carrying
- A seven-year minimum when prosecutors prove brandishing
- A 10-year minimum when the firearm was discharged
- Longer mandatory terms for certain machine guns, suppressors, and destructive devices
The firearm does not have to be fired. Prosecutors may argue that a gun advanced or protected the alleged crime because it was found near:
- Illegal drugs
- Cash
- Packaging materials
- Distribution records
- Other alleged evidence of trafficking
A gun near drugs is not automatically a gun possessed “in furtherance” of trafficking. The defense may dispute knowledge, accessibility, ownership, proximity, and whether the firearm had any meaningful relationship to the alleged crime.
Straw Purchasing a Firearm
A lawful-looking retail purchase can become a federal case when agents believe the named buyer was only standing in for another person. These straw purchase investigations often center on what the buyer intended and what they reported on Form 4473. Prosecutors may also rely on 18 U.S.C. § 932.
Questions that may determine whether the transaction was lawful include:
- Whose money funded the transaction
- Who chose the specific gun
- What the purchaser intended when completing the sale
- Whether the weapon was bought as a legitimate gift
- Whether the buyer knew the recipient could not lawfully possess it
Potential evidence may include text messages, payment records, store surveillance, purchase forms, and statements made to investigators.
Transporting or Transferring Firearms Unlawfully
18 U.S.C. § 933 prohibits certain transfers, transportation, or receipt of firearms when the accused knows or has reasonable cause to believe the firearm will be used, possessed, or transferred unlawfully.
Federal agents may characterize firearms as trafficked when they were allegedly:
- Bought for someone legally barred from possessing them
- Transported through multiple states or across an international border
- Transferred to people suspected of drug or violent offenses
- Obtained through a chain of straw buyers
- Repeatedly resold outside the federal licensing system
- Exported or smuggled to another country
Unlicensed Firearms Dealing
An individual may lawfully make some private firearm sales without becoming a licensed dealer. Problems arise when federal agents believe the person crossed from disposing of personal property into running a gun business without the required federal firearms license.
Prosecutors may examine:
- The number and frequency of sales
- How quickly firearms were resold after purchase
- Whether the accused advertised firearms for sale
- Customer communications and payment records
- Whether transactions were intended to produce a profit
- Whether the accused maintained firearm inventory
False Statements During a Firearm Purchase
Federal prosecutors may charge a person for allegedly lying to a licensed firearms dealer about a fact that could affect the transaction. Section 922(a)(6) generally requires proof that the statement was knowingly false and material to the legality of the purchase.
Alleged false statements may involve:
- Whether the person completing the form was the real buyer
- The existence or nature of a prior conviction
- Illegal drug use or controlled-substance status
- A qualifying domestic violence case or protection order
- Citizenship, immigration, or residency status
- The buyer’s address, identity, or supporting documents
The government must do more than point to an inaccurate box on a form. The defense may dispute whether the response was truly false, whether the accused understood it was wrong, or whether it made any legal difference to the sale.
Possessing a Gun With a Removed Serial Number
Federal law restricts the knowing possession, receipt, or transportation of certain firearms whose serial numbers have been changed, removed, or made unreadable. The relevant regulation appears at 27 CFR § 478.34.
The serial number itself is only part of the case. Other issues include:
- Knowledge of the damaged serial number
- The degree and legal significance of the alteration
- Whether experts can recover the firearm’s identifying information
- Whether the gun was actually possessed or controlled by the accused
The alleged alteration can affect more than guilt or innocence. It may also support an enhancement when the sentencing guidelines are calculated.
“Ghost Gun” Investigations
A privately made firearm is not automatically illegal simply because an individual assembled it. Criminal exposure may arise depending on:
Criminal exposure may arise depending on:
- Who possessed the firearm
- How it was manufactured
- Whether it was transferred or sold
- Whether the accused was acting as a firearms manufacturer or dealer
- Whether required markings were missing
- Whether the firearm was connected to other illegal conduct
Sentencing enhancements may also apply in some cases involving firearms without required serial numbers.
Charges Involving Machine Guns, Silencers, and Short-Barreled Firearms
The National Firearms Act imposes registration, taxation, manufacturing, and transfer requirements on certain weapons and devices.
The Act covers categories such as:
- Machine guns
- Short-barreled rifles
- Short-barreled shotguns
- Silencers and suppressors
- Destructive devices
- Certain weapons classified as “any other weapon”
An NFA prosecution may be based on alleged possession of an unregistered weapon, unlawful manufacture or transfer, or missing required identifying information. Depending on the charge, a conviction may expose the accused to as much as 10 years in federal prison, financial penalties, and firearm forfeiture.
Potential Punishment for Federal Weapons Offenses in Indianapolis, IN
Federal firearm penalties depend on the specific statute, the type of weapon, the accused’s criminal history, whether another offense was involved, and how the United States Sentencing Guidelines apply.
| Type of Federal Firearm Case | Potential Prison Exposure |
|---|---|
| Felon in possession or another prohibited-person offense | Generally up to 15 years in federal prison; qualifying Armed Career Criminal Act cases carry a mandatory minimum of 15 years |
| A § 924(c) firearm charge tied to drug trafficking or a qualifying violent offense | A consecutive mandatory term beginning at five years and increasing based on how the firearm was allegedly used |
| Buying a firearm for another person under § 932 | A maximum of 15 years in ordinary cases, potentially rising to 25 years when the weapon is believed destined for certain serious offenses |
| Trafficking firearms to prohibited or unlawful recipients | As many as 15 years behind bars |
| Dealing firearms without a required federal license | A possible federal sentence of as much as five years |
| Lying about material information during a federally regulated gun sale | Potential imprisonment for up to 10 years |
| Federal charges involving an altered firearm serial number | Generally up to five years in federal prison, with possible sentencing enhancements |
| National Firearms Act violations | As much as 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and forfeiture |
| Illegal machine gun possession or transfer | Up to a decade in many cases, before accounting for mandatory consecutive time or other charges tied to the weapon |
The final sentencing picture is assembled from several moving parts. The charge itself matters, but so do the quantity and characteristics of the firearms, the defendant’s record, any required minimum term, and the guideline calculations used in federal court.
Additional penalties and long-term consequences may include:
- Thousands of dollars or more in fines
- Years of supervised release after leaving prison
- Government forfeiture claims against firearms, ammunition, money, vehicles, and other assets
- A lasting ban on firearm possession
- Collateral damage to career prospects, housing access, and occupational licensing
- Potential immigration and residency consequences for anyone who is not a U.S. citizen
The federal system does not offer traditional parole. While eligible prisoners may earn limited good-conduct credit, a federal sentence usually requires serving most of the term imposed by the court.
Federal Gun Charges and the ACCA
For some defendants, the biggest battle is not whether § 922(g) applies, but whether the government can trigger the ACCA. That designation replaces the ordinary sentencing range with a mandatory minimum term of 15 years.
ACCA may apply to a person convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) who has three qualifying prior convictions involving violent felonies, serious drug crimes, or some combination of the two, so long as the offenses occurred on different occasions.
A conviction that sounds violent in ordinary conversation may still fail to qualify under federal law. These disputes often require a close reading of statutes, old court documents, and changing ACCA precedent.
Defense counsel may attack the enhancement by examining:
- Whether the earlier conviction legally qualifies as a violent felony or serious drug offense
- Whether the permitted court records prove the necessary version of the offense
- Whether the prior crimes were truly committed on separate occasions
- Whether any conviction was overturned, set aside, expunged, or invalidated
- Whether firearm rights or other civil rights were restored
Because the ACCA creates a mandatory minimum sentence, resolving even one disputed prior conviction can make an enormous difference.
Federal Firearm Sentencing Guideline Enhancements
A firearm case can carry substantial sentencing exposure even without a mandatory minimum. The United States Sentencing Guidelines may recommend a much higher prison range based on specific offense characteristics.
Guideline enhancements may be tied to claims involving:
- Large numbers of firearms
- Stolen weapons
- Altered or obliterated serial numbers
- Trafficking-related conduct
- Machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, or similar regulated weapons
- Firearm possession connected to another felony
- Reckless endangerment while fleeing
- Acting as an organizer or leader
- Obstruction of justice allegations
Federal judges are not required to impose the guideline sentence, but they must begin by calculating it. A defense lawyer can object to enhancements, develop mitigation, seek a downward variance or departure, and explain why a shorter sentence is sufficient under the law.
When Should You Contact a Federal Firearms Defense Lawyer?
If ATF agents or federal prosecutors are looking at your case, early legal representation can matter. You do not have to wait until you are arrested, indicted, or standing in court before contacting an attorney.
Common signs that federal authorities may be building a case include:
- ATF, FBI, DEA, or task force agents attempt to question you
- Agents execute a search warrant at your home or business
- Someone close to you receives a subpoena
- Law enforcement seizes firearms, phones, computers, or records
- You receive a federal target letter
- A codefendant or alleged associate is arrested
- A state firearm case is dismissed or delayed without explanation
- You learn that federal prosecutors are reviewing your case
Early representation may allow a federal crimes attorney in Indianapolis, IN to communicate with investigators, prevent an unprotected interview, preserve evidence, challenge a search, evaluate possible exposure, and present information before prosecutors make charging decisions.
Call Combs Waterkotte About Your Federal Gun Case
Federal firearm cases move quickly and carry enormous consequences. Combs Waterkotte represents people in Indianapolis, IN and nationwide, drawing on the insight of former prosecutors who understand federal investigations, charging decisions, and courtroom strategy.
Our defense begins with a hard look at how the case was built. That may mean attacking an unlawful search, exposing weaknesses in witness testimony, disputing possession, and fighting guideline enhancements that could add years to the sentence.
Strong negotiation starts with being prepared to try the case. We explore resolutions when they protect the client, but we do not treat a plea as the automatic destination.
Our firm brings decades of combined defense experience, an in-house investigator, and a history of handling severe state and federal allegations. We have the personnel and resources to defend firearm cases at every stage, including investigation, indictment, trial, sentencing, and appeal.
If federal agents are investigating you or charges have already been filed, now is the time to protect yourself. Contact Combs Waterkotte online or call (314) 900-HELP to speak with an experienced federal gun charges attorney serving Indianapolis, IN.
