When federal prosecutors add a gun charge in Reno, NV, the stakes can climb fast. A case that was already serious may suddenly carry mandatory incarceration, consecutive sentencing, property forfeiture, and permanent limits on firearm ownership. These prosecutions are often built by the ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office alongside allegations of federal drug crimes, conspiracy, robbery, or violent conduct.
You can face a federal gun charge without ever pulling a trigger. The government may focus instead on where the firearm was found, who could control it, how it was purchased, whether registration rules were followed, or what was written on a purchase form. Once attached to another case in Reno, NV, a firearm count can become the part that drives the sentence.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
When federal agents and prosecutors set their sights on someone in Reno, NV, Combs Waterkotte is prepared to push back. Our federal criminal defense team serving Reno, NV looks beyond the fact that a gun was found and asks the questions that can change a case: Who knew it was there? Who could control it? Was the search lawful? Can the government actually connect it to the alleged crime?
Federal cases often take shape quietly, long before charges appear on a docket. If you have been arrested, contacted by ATF, warned that you are under investigation, or received a target letter, call (314) 900-HELP or contact our firm online. The earlier the defense gets involved, the more room there may be to influence what comes next.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
This guide addresses:
- How firearm allegations enter the federal system
- Steps to take when ATF or federal prosecutors are investigating you
- The gun crimes most often charged in federal court
- How mandatory prison terms and guideline enhancements work
- When the Armed Career Criminal Act may apply
- Why early legal representation matters
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
What Makes a Gun Charge Federal?
Most firearm cases begin under state law. However, a case may enter the federal system when the alleged conduct violates the federal Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal statute. State and local authorities may also refer a case to federal prosecutors when they believe federal penalties will be more severe.
Federal jurisdiction may arise when:
- A firearm traveled through interstate or foreign commerce
- The accused is legally prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition
- A firearm was allegedly used during a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence
- The case involves firearm trafficking, smuggling, straw purchasing, or unlicensed dealing
- The weapon is a machine gun, silencer, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or destructive device
- The firearm had an altered or removed serial number
- The alleged conduct occurred on federal property or involved a federal investigation
- Federal agents believe the firearm is connected to organized criminal activity
The first sign of trouble may come late in the investigation. Agents may already have traced the gun, interviewed witnesses, reviewed online activity, pulled phone data, and gathered physical evidence before the accused knows federal prosecutors are involved.
What to Do During a Federal Firearms Investigation in Reno, NV
You do not have to be arrested to need a federal defense attorney. By the time ATF agents contact you, execute a search warrant, or ask to speak with you, they may have already spent weeks or months building their case. What you do next can significantly affect the outcome.
Protect yourself by doing the following:
- Exercise your right to remain silent. You do not need to answer questions from ATF agents, task force officers, or federal prosecutors without a federal firearms attorney in Reno, NV present. What feels like harmless background information can become evidence.
- Do not give blanket consent. If law enforcement has a valid warrant, let your lawyer challenge it later. Do not voluntarily open additional devices, accounts, rooms, safes, or vehicles unless counsel advises you to do so.
- Do not erase the paper trail. Keep purchase forms, receipts, emails, photographs, texts, and other records intact. Destroying or altering evidence can make the situation far worse.
- Say less to everyone else, too. Friends, relatives, coworkers, and alleged associates can be interviewed or subpoenaed. Social media posts and private messages are not safe places to explain the case.
- Contact a federal criminal defense lawyer in Reno, NV immediately. The earlier your attorney enters the case, the sooner they can protect your rights, identify weak points in the investigation, and keep you from stepping into traps the government has already set.
Federal Weapons Charges You May Face in Reno, NV
Felon in Possession of a Firearm
The phrase “felon in possession” covers only part of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The statute reaches multiple classes of people barred from possessing guns or ammunition, even when the firearm was never fired or displayed.
People who may fall under § 922(g) include:
- Individuals with certain felony or felony-level convictions
- People accused of fleeing to avoid prosecution
- People considered unlawful users of illegal drugs or other controlled substances
- Individuals covered by certain domestic protection orders
- People convicted of qualifying misdemeanor domestic violence crimes
- Some noncitizens and former service members who received dishonorable discharges
The prosecution must generally connect two pieces of the puzzle: the accused knowingly possessed the gun or ammunition, and they knew about the legal status that made that possession prohibited.
The government may try to prove possession in either of two ways:
- Actual possession: The accused allegedly carried the firearm or had it physically on their body.
- Constructive possession: The accused allegedly knew where the gun was and had both the power and intent to exercise control over it.
Constructive possession can become the fault line of the case when a firearm is recovered from a place multiple people could access, such as a shared residence, borrowed car, hotel room, or common storage area.
Possessing a Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Crime or Crime of Violence
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) makes it a separate federal offense to use or carry a firearm during and in relation to a qualifying crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or to possess one in furtherance of such a crime.
Because these penalties are typically consecutive, the firearm count can add the following time after the sentence for the underlying crime:
- Five years or more when a firearm was possessed, used, or carried
- Seven years or more when the weapon was allegedly displayed or brandished
- Ten years or more when the gun was fired
- Substantially greater exposure for specially regulated firearms and devices
The prosecution may describe a firearm as a tool of the alleged offense even when it stayed hidden or untouched. That argument commonly relies on its location near:
- Illegal drugs
- Cash
- Packaging materials
- Distribution records
- Other alleged evidence of trafficking
The key fight may be over the connection between the person, the firearm, and the underlying offense. Defense counsel can challenge whether the accused knew the gun was there, had the ability to reach or control it, or possessed it to advance any criminal activity.
Straw Purchasing a Firearm
Federal prosecutors may allege a straw purchase when the person completing the transaction is accused of buying the gun on behalf of someone else. The case may involve the “actual transferee/buyer” question on ATF Form 4473, along with charges under 18 U.S.C. § 932.
Questions that may determine whether the transaction was lawful include:
- Whose money funded the transaction
- Who chose the specific gun
- What the purchaser intended when completing the sale
- Whether the weapon was bought as a legitimate gift
- Whether the buyer knew the recipient could not lawfully possess it
Agents may build the case from messages, bank or payment-app records, dealer paperwork, surveillance video, and whatever the purchaser or recipient said during interviews.
Transporting or Transferring Firearms Unlawfully
18 U.S.C. § 933 prohibits certain transfers, transportation, or receipt of firearms when the accused knows or has reasonable cause to believe the firearm will be used, possessed, or transferred unlawfully.
Conduct that may lead to a federal trafficking charge includes firearms being:
- Bought for someone legally barred from possessing them
- Transported through multiple states or across an international border
- Transferred to people suspected of drug or violent offenses
- Obtained through a chain of straw buyers
- Repeatedly resold outside the federal licensing system
- Exported or smuggled to another country
Unlicensed Firearms Dealing
An individual may lawfully make some private firearm sales without becoming a licensed dealer. Problems arise when federal agents believe the person crossed from disposing of personal property into running a gun business without the required federal firearms license.
There is no single fact that settles the issue. Investigators may review:
- How many firearms were sold and how often sales occurred
- Whether guns were purchased and quickly resold
- Online listings, advertisements, or social media offers
- Messages with prospective buyers and records of payment
- Whether the person expected to earn money from the transactions
- Whether firearms were kept on hand for future customers
Federal Charges for False Firearm Purchase Statements
Federal prosecutors may charge a person for allegedly lying to a licensed firearms dealer about a fact that could affect the transaction. Section 922(a)(6) generally requires proof that the statement was knowingly false and material to the legality of the purchase.
The disputed answer may concern:
- The actual transferee or intended recipient
- Felony or other prohibiting convictions
- Unlawful drug use
- Domestic violence history or court orders
- Nationality and immigration status
- Personal identification and residence information
The defense may challenge whether the answer was actually false, whether the accused knowingly provided incorrect information, and whether the statement affected the legality of the transaction.
Possession of a Firearm With an Altered or Obliterated Serial Number
Under 27 CFR § 478.34, federal law prohibits knowingly transporting, receiving, or possessing certain firearms with serial numbers that have been removed, altered, or obliterated.
The serial number itself is only part of the case. Other issues include:
- Whether the alteration was visible or known to the accused
- Whether the serial number was legally “removed, obliterated, or altered”
- What laboratory testing reveals about the original markings
- Whether prosecutors can prove knowing possession of that specific gun
Even when it is not charged as a separate count, a defaced serial number may be used to push the recommended federal sentence higher.
“Ghost Gun” Investigations
Building or assembling a gun for personal use does not, by itself, automatically make the firearm illegal. Federal problems involving a privately made firearm usually depend on the person involved, the weapon’s configuration, and what happened after it was made.
Key issues in these cases include:
- Who possessed the firearm
- How it was manufactured
- Whether it was transferred or sold
- Whether the accused was acting as a firearms manufacturer or dealer
- Whether required markings were missing
- Whether the firearm was connected to other illegal conduct
Even where the firearm itself is not prohibited, the absence of a required serial number may increase the recommended guideline sentence.
Charges Involving Machine Guns, Silencers, and Short-Barreled Firearms
A firearm that is lawful in one configuration can fall under much stricter rules after certain modifications. The National Firearms Act governs several categories of weapons and devices through registration, taxation, transfer, and manufacturing requirements.
The Act covers categories such as:
- Automatic weapons
- Rifles and shotguns below specified barrel-length requirements
- Silencers or sound suppressors
- Destructive devices
- Modified firearms that meet an NFA definition
- Other specially classified weapons
Charges may involve possessing an unregistered weapon, illegally manufacturing or transferring one, or possessing a firearm with required identifying information removed. A conviction can carry up to 10 years in federal prison, fines, and forfeiture.
Federal Firearm Sentences in Reno, NV
Two people charged with firearm offenses may face very different outcomes. Federal sentencing depends on what prosecutors can prove, which statute applies, whether the law requires consecutive time, the accused’s criminal history, and how the court calculates the advisory guideline range.
| Type of Federal Firearm Case | Potential Prison Exposure |
|---|---|
| Possession by a prohibited person under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) | Ordinarily punishable by as much as 15 years; the Armed Career Criminal Act may require at least 15 years for qualifying defendants |
| Using, carrying, or possessing a gun in furtherance of another federal crime | Mandatory minimum of five years, seven years if brandished, or 10 years if discharged, generally served consecutively |
| Misrepresenting the true buyer of a firearm | Potentially 15 years in federal prison, or 25 years when the alleged circumstances involve certain intended serious crimes |
| Unlawful transportation or transfer of firearms | Up to 15 years in federal prison |
| Operating as an unlicensed firearms dealer | Typically punishable by up to five years |
| Knowingly providing material false information to a licensed firearm dealer | Up to 10 years in federal prison |
| Receiving, transporting, or possessing a firearm with defaced identifying marks | A possible five-year sentence plus additional guideline consequences |
| Federal charges involving silencers, short-barreled firearms, machine guns, or other NFA items | As much as 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and forfeiture |
| Federal machine gun offenses | Frequently punishable by as much as 10 years, although a connection to drug trafficking or violence can drive the sentence much higher |
The penalties listed above are starting points, not predictions. The sentence in a particular case may rise or fall based on the statute charged, the number and type of weapons, prior convictions, any mandatory minimum, and the calculation required by the federal sentencing guidelines.
Federal sentences may also include:
- Substantial fines
- Supervised release after imprisonment
- Forfeiture of firearms, ammunition, money, vehicles, or other property
- Loss of firearm rights
- Restrictions on employment, housing, and professional licensing
- Immigration consequences for noncitizens
The number announced in court matters. Federal prisoners do not have access to conventional parole, and good-time reductions are limited, so the sentence served is usually close to the sentence ordered.
The Armed Career Criminal Act
For some defendants, the biggest battle is not whether § 922(g) applies, but whether the government can trigger the ACCA. That designation replaces the ordinary sentencing range with a mandatory minimum term of 15 years.
ACCA may apply to a person convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) who has three qualifying prior convictions involving violent felonies, serious drug crimes, or some combination of the two, so long as the offenses occurred on different occasions.
ACCA litigation can become highly technical. The court may compare the wording of the prior state statute to the federal definition, review charging papers or plea records, and determine which version of the law controls. A state-law label is not necessarily the final word.
An experienced Reno, NV federal gun charges lawyer may challenge:
- Whether the prior offense meets the federal definition
- Whether the conviction records establish the required elements
- Whether multiple offenses occurred on different occasions
- Whether a conviction was vacated, expunged, or otherwise invalid
- Whether the accused’s civil rights had been restored
When three qualifying convictions are required, knocking out one may knock out the entire 15-year mandatory minimum. That can completely reshape the sentencing landscape.
How Sentencing Enhancements Can Increase a Federal Gun Sentence
The sentence in a federal firearm case is influenced by more than the statute itself. Even when the law does not require a mandatory minimum prison term, guideline enhancements may substantially increase the advisory sentencing range.
The advisory guideline range may increase if the government proves factors such as:
- Large numbers of firearms
- Stolen weapons
- Altered or obliterated serial numbers
- Trafficking-related conduct
- Machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, or similar regulated weapons
- Firearm possession connected to another felony
- Reckless endangerment while fleeing
- Acting as an organizer or leader
- Obstruction of justice allegations
The advisory guideline range is only one part of the sentencing decision, but it carries significant weight. Defense counsel may dispute factual allegations, challenge the legal basis for enhancements, present mitigating information, and advocate for a sentence below the recommended range.
When Should You Hire a Federal Gun Charges Lawyer in Reno, NV?
If ATF agents or federal prosecutors are looking at your case, early legal representation can matter. You do not have to wait until you are arrested, indicted, or standing in court before contacting an attorney.
Possible indicators of a federal investigation include:
- Federal agents ask to interview you
- Your home, vehicle, or business is searched pursuant to a warrant
- A friend, family member, or coworker is served with a subpoena
- Investigators seize guns, electronic devices, documents, or financial records
- You receive a target letter from federal prosecutors
- Someone allegedly connected to the investigation is arrested
- Your state criminal case suddenly stalls or disappears without explanation
- You hear that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is reviewing the matter
The earlier a defense attorney becomes involved, the more options may exist. Depending on the circumstances, counsel can handle communications with investigators, help avoid unnecessary interviews, identify constitutional issues, preserve evidence, assess the strength of the government’s case, and present mitigating information before prosecutors decide whether to seek an indictment.
Speak With a Federal Gun Charges Lawyer in Reno, NV
When federal agents and prosecutors are building a gun case, you need counsel familiar with the system from both sides. Combs Waterkotte represents Reno, NV clients nationwide, and our attorneys include former prosecutors with firsthand knowledge of how federal cases are developed and litigated.
We approach every case with a trial-ready mindset, thoroughly examining the government’s evidence, challenging unlawful searches and seizures, scrutinizing witness credibility, and fighting unsupported sentencing enhancements.
If a negotiated resolution serves your interests, we pursue it with leverage built through preparation. If the government will not offer a fair outcome, we are ready to litigate the case in court.
From investigating the government’s theory to preparing for appeal, our team is equipped for the full life of a federal firearm case. Clients benefit from decades of combined experience, dedicated investigative support, and a record of defending people facing life-changing criminal accusations.
If federal agents are investigating you or charges have already been filed, now is the time to protect yourself. Contact Combs Waterkotte online or call (314) 900-HELP to speak with an experienced federal gun charges attorney serving Reno, NV.
