When federal prosecutors add a gun charge in Nevada, the stakes can climb fast. A case that was already serious may suddenly carry mandatory incarceration, consecutive sentencing, property forfeiture, and permanent limits on firearm ownership. These prosecutions are often built by the ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office alongside allegations of federal drug crimes, conspiracy, robbery, or violent conduct.
The government does not necessarily need evidence that you used a gun. Possessing a firearm, having access to one, buying one for someone else, providing false information during a purchase, or possessing certain unregistered weapons may be enough to support federal charges. A firearm allegation in Nevada can also add years or decades to the sentence imposed for another offense.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte defends people in Nevada facing high-stakes federal investigations and prosecutions throughout the United States. Our Nevada federal criminal defense lawyers examine how the firearm was discovered, whether prosecutors can prove knowing possession, whether the weapon was connected to another alleged crime, and whether law enforcement violated your constitutional rights.
Maybe agents have already searched your property. Maybe someone close to you has been questioned. Maybe a target letter just landed in your hands. Whatever tipped you off, do not ignore it. Reach out to Combs Waterkotte or call (314) 900-HELP before speaking with investigators or making a move that cannot be undone.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
Below, we explain:
- Why some gun cases are prosecuted federally instead of by the state
- How to respond if agents, subpoenas, or a target letter signal an investigation
- Possession, trafficking, straw purchase, NFA, and related firearm offenses
- The penalties that can be added to another federal sentence
- How prior convictions can trigger ACCA exposure
- When to bring in a federal firearm defense attorney
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Why Are Some Gun Charges Prosecuted Federally?
A firearm arrest may start with local police, but that does not mean it will stay in state court. Federal prosecutors can take over when the allegations fall under the Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal criminal law. In some cases, state authorities hand the matter over because federal charges offer prosecutors a tougher sentencing path.
Common reasons a firearm case enters federal court include:
- A firearm traveled through interstate or foreign commerce
- The accused is legally prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition
- A firearm was allegedly used during a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence
- The case involves firearm trafficking, smuggling, straw purchasing, or unlicensed dealing
- The weapon is a machine gun, silencer, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or destructive device
- The firearm had an altered or removed serial number
- The alleged conduct occurred on federal property or involved a federal investigation
- Federal agents believe the firearm is connected to organized criminal activity
Federal agents rarely start from zero when they make contact. Before you realize a case exists, they may already have video footage, digital communications, witness interviews, firearm tracing records, and laboratory evidence in hand.
Under Federal Gun Investigation in Nevada? Take These Steps
Federal investigations usually develop quietly. If agents have reached out, searched your property, questioned someone close to you, or asked you to “clear a few things up,” assume the case is already moving. You should treat every conversation and decision as part of the defense.
If federal agents may be building a gun case against you:
- Stop talking and call a federal firearms lawyer in Nevada. You are not required to answer questions simply because an agent sounds friendly or says the conversation is informal. Your right to remain silent exists before an arrest, not just after one.
- Do not expand the search for them. If agents present a warrant, remain calm and do not obstruct them. However, you do not have to volunteer access to additional rooms, devices, vehicles, accounts, or property that the warrant does not cover.
- Save everything. Preserve purchase paperwork, receipts, messages, photographs, transfer records, emails, and anything else that may provide context. Deleting material can create a separate problem and may be portrayed as obstruction.
- Keep the case off the group chat. Do not post online, compare stories with witnesses, or discuss details over calls and text messages. The government may later obtain those communications.
- Bring in counsel early. A federal criminal defense attorney in Nevada can deal directly with investigators, assess your exposure, and help prevent avoidable damage before charges are filed.
Federal Weapons Charges You May Face in Nevada
Federal Prohibited-Person Firearm Charges
The phrase “felon in possession” covers only part of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The statute reaches multiple classes of people barred from possessing guns or ammunition, even when the firearm was never fired or displayed.
People who may fall under § 922(g) include:
- A criminal record involving an offense punishable by more than one year
- An active fugitive status
- Alleged unlawful controlled-substance use
- Certain restraining orders involving an intimate partner or child
- A qualifying domestic violence conviction
- Particular immigration classifications or a dishonorable military discharge
A conviction ordinarily requires more than showing that a gun was nearby. The government generally must prove knowing possession and that the accused knew they belonged to the category that prohibited possession.
Possession may be:
- Actual possession: The accused allegedly carried the firearm or had it physically on their body.
- Constructive possession: The accused allegedly knew where the gun was and had both the power and intent to exercise control over it.
Constructive possession can become the fault line of the case when a firearm is recovered from a place multiple people could access, such as a shared residence, borrowed car, hotel room, or common storage area.
Possessing a Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Crime or Crime of Violence
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) makes it a separate federal offense to use or carry a firearm during and in relation to a qualifying crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or to possess one in furtherance of such a crime.
The mandatory minimum sentence generally must be served consecutively to the sentence for the underlying offense:
- Five years or more when a firearm was possessed, used, or carried
- Seven years or more when the weapon was allegedly displayed or brandished
- Ten years or more when the gun was fired
- Substantially greater exposure for specially regulated firearms and devices
A § 924(c) theory may rest entirely on where the gun was found. The government often argues that proximity to the following items shows the firearm was kept to further the alleged crime:
- Controlled substances
- Large amounts of currency
- Baggies, scales, or packaging supplies
- Ledgers, customer lists, or distribution records
- Other items prosecutors associate with drug sales
A gun near drugs is not automatically a gun possessed “in furtherance” of trafficking. The defense may dispute knowledge, accessibility, ownership, proximity, and whether the firearm had any meaningful relationship to the alleged crime.
Straw Purchasing a Firearm
A straw purchase generally occurs when one person buys a firearm for someone else while falsely claiming to be the actual buyer. Charges may arise from statements made on ATF Form 4473 or under 18 U.S.C. § 932.
The government and defense may focus on:
- Payment apps, cash withdrawals, or reimbursements
- Who researched, requested, or picked out the firearm
- The buyer’s plan before entering the store
- Whether the gun was genuinely purchased as a gift
- Whether the eventual recipient was prohibited or intended to use the firearm unlawfully
These cases leave a digital and documentary trail. Prosecutors may rely on Form 4473, receipts, cash transfers, text conversations, security footage, firearm tracing records, and interview statements to argue who the real buyer was.
Federal Firearms Trafficking Charges
Federal firearms trafficking cases often focus on what the accused knew about the destination or intended use of the weapons. 18 U.S.C. § 933 can apply when firearms are allegedly transferred, transported, or received with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that unlawful conduct will follow.
Federal agents may characterize firearms as trafficked when they were allegedly:
- Bought for someone legally barred from possessing them
- Transported through multiple states or across an international border
- Transferred to people suspected of drug or violent offenses
- Obtained through a chain of straw buyers
- Repeatedly resold outside the federal licensing system
- Exported or smuggled to another country
Dealing Firearms Without a Federal License
An individual may lawfully make some private firearm sales without becoming a licensed dealer. Problems arise when federal agents believe the person crossed from disposing of personal property into running a gun business without the required federal firearms license.
The case may turn on the overall pattern of activity, including:
- How many firearms were sold and how often sales occurred
- Whether guns were purchased and quickly resold
- Online listings, advertisements, or social media offers
- Messages with prospective buyers and records of payment
- Whether the person expected to earn money from the transactions
- Whether firearms were kept on hand for future customers
False Information Given to a Licensed Gun Dealer
Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), it is illegal to knowingly make a false statement to a federally licensed firearms dealer when that statement is material to the legality of the sale.
Examples of information prosecutors may claim was falsified include:
- The actual transferee or intended recipient
- Felony or other prohibiting convictions
- Unlawful drug use
- Domestic violence history or court orders
- Nationality and immigration status
- Personal identification and residence information
The government must do more than point to an inaccurate box on a form. The defense may dispute whether the response was truly false, whether the accused understood it was wrong, or whether it made any legal difference to the sale.
Possessing a Gun With a Removed Serial Number
Federal law restricts the knowing possession, receipt, or transportation of certain firearms whose serial numbers have been changed, removed, or made unreadable. The relevant regulation appears at 27 CFR § 478.34.
The case may depend on questions such as:
- Whether the alteration was visible or known to the accused
- Whether the serial number was legally “removed, obliterated, or altered”
- What laboratory testing reveals about the original markings
- Whether prosecutors can prove knowing possession of that specific gun
The alleged alteration can affect more than guilt or innocence. It may also support an enhancement when the sentencing guidelines are calculated.
Federal Charges Involving Privately Made Firearms
A privately made firearm is not automatically illegal simply because an individual assembled it. Criminal exposure may arise depending on:
Federal agents may look at the entire life of the firearm, including:
- Who assembled and ultimately possessed it
- The parts, process, and configuration used to make it
- Whether it remained for personal use or was transferred to someone else
- Whether multiple weapons were built for sale
- Whether federal marking requirements applied
- Whether the firearm appeared in another criminal investigation
Unserialized firearms may bring an additional sentencing problem, particularly when the federal guidelines call for an enhancement.
National Firearms Act Violations
The National Firearms Act imposes registration, taxation, manufacturing, and transfer requirements on certain weapons and devices.
The Act covers categories such as:
- Fully automatic firearms and machine guns
- Rifles with barrels or overall lengths below federal limits
- Short-barreled shotguns
- Firearm silencers and suppressors
- Explosive or other qualifying destructive devices
- Weapons falling within the federal “any other weapon” category
Charges may involve possessing an unregistered weapon, illegally manufacturing or transferring one, or possessing a firearm with required identifying information removed. A conviction can carry up to 10 years in federal prison, fines, and forfeiture.
Potential Punishment for Federal Weapons Offenses in Nevada
Federal firearm penalties depend on the specific statute, the type of weapon, the accused’s criminal history, whether another offense was involved, and how the United States Sentencing Guidelines apply.
| Federal Firearm Charge | Potential Prison Exposure |
|---|---|
| Unlawful firearm possession by a prohibited person under § 922(g) | Ordinarily punishable by as much as 15 years; the Armed Career Criminal Act may require at least 15 years for qualifying defendants |
| Firearm possession or use connected to a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence | Five years or more added to the underlying sentence, with seven years for brandishing and 10 years for firing the weapon |
| Misrepresenting the true buyer of a firearm | As much as 15 years, with enhanced exposure of up to 25 years in qualifying aggravated cases |
| Firearms trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 933 | Federal imprisonment for up to 15 years |
| Dealing firearms without a required federal license | Generally a five-year maximum term of imprisonment |
| Knowingly providing material false information to a licensed firearm dealer | A maximum sentence of 10 years |
| Receiving, transporting, or possessing a firearm with defaced identifying marks | Up to five years in many cases, with further sentencing exposure through an enhancement |
| Federal charges involving silencers, short-barreled firearms, machine guns, or other NFA items | As much as 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and forfeiture |
| Possessing or transferring a prohibited automatic weapon | Often up to 10 years, with substantially greater exposure when connected to a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence |
These are general statutory penalties. The actual sentencing range may depend on the specific charge, the type and number of firearms involved, the defendant’s criminal history, applicable mandatory minimums, and the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
Even after the prison term is calculated, the court may impose or trigger:
- Thousands of dollars or more in fines
- Years of supervised release after leaving prison
- Government forfeiture claims against firearms, ammunition, money, vehicles, and other assets
- A lasting ban on firearm possession
- Collateral damage to career prospects, housing access, and occupational licensing
- Potential immigration and residency consequences for anyone who is not a U.S. citizen
The federal system does not offer traditional parole. While eligible prisoners may earn limited good-conduct credit, a federal sentence usually requires serving most of the term imposed by the court.
The 15-Year Armed Career Criminal Enhancement
The Armed Career Criminal Act can turn an already serious prohibited-person case into one with a 15-year mandatory minimum. The law is often referred to by its initials, ACCA.
A § 922(g) defendant may face the enhancement when their record includes three prior offenses that satisfy ACCA’s federal definitions and were not all part of the same criminal occasion.
A conviction that sounds violent in ordinary conversation may still fail to qualify under federal law. These disputes often require a close reading of statutes, old court documents, and changing ACCA precedent.
Defense counsel may attack the enhancement by examining:
- Whether the prior offense meets the federal definition
- Whether the conviction records establish the required elements
- Whether multiple offenses occurred on different occasions
- Whether a conviction was vacated, expunged, or otherwise invalid
- Whether the accused’s civil rights had been restored
An ACCA case can hinge on a single prior offense. If one conviction does not qualify, the mandatory minimum may no longer apply, potentially removing years from the defendant’s exposure.
Federal Firearm Sentencing Guideline Enhancements
Avoiding a mandatory minimum does not necessarily mean avoiding a lengthy sentence. Federal judges begin by calculating the advisory guideline range, and enhancements can dramatically increase that recommendation.
Guideline enhancements may be tied to claims involving:
- Large numbers of firearms
- Stolen weapons
- Altered or obliterated serial numbers
- Trafficking-related conduct
- Machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, or similar regulated weapons
- Firearm possession connected to another felony
- Reckless endangerment while fleeing
- Acting as an organizer or leader
- Obstruction of justice allegations
The advisory guideline range is only one part of the sentencing decision, but it carries significant weight. Defense counsel may dispute factual allegations, challenge the legal basis for enhancements, present mitigating information, and advocate for a sentence below the recommended range.
Do You Need a Federal Gun Charges Lawyer?
If ATF agents or federal prosecutors are looking at your case, early legal representation can matter. You do not have to wait until you are arrested, indicted, or standing in court before contacting an attorney.
Warning signs include:
- Federal investigators want to speak with you
- Your property is searched or evidence is seized
- Someone close to the investigation receives grand jury process
- Law enforcement takes firearms, records, or digital devices
- You are identified as the recipient of a target letter
- Another person in the alleged investigation is charged or arrested
- Your state case appears to have been put on hold without a clear reason
- You learn federal prosecutors are evaluating potential charges
The earlier a defense attorney becomes involved, the more options may exist. Depending on the circumstances, counsel can handle communications with investigators, help avoid unnecessary interviews, identify constitutional issues, preserve evidence, assess the strength of the government’s case, and present mitigating information before prosecutors decide whether to seek an indictment.
Call Combs Waterkotte About Your Federal Gun Case
When federal agents and prosecutors are building a gun case, you need counsel familiar with the system from both sides. Combs Waterkotte represents Nevada clients nationwide, and our attorneys include former prosecutors with firsthand knowledge of how federal cases are developed and litigated.
Our defense begins with a hard look at how the case was built. That may mean attacking an unlawful search, exposing weaknesses in witness testimony, disputing possession, and fighting guideline enhancements that could add years to the sentence.
When negotiations make sense, we negotiate from a position of strength. When they don’t, we are prepared to take your case to court.
With decades of combined criminal defense experience, a dedicated investigator on staff, and a record of defending clients against some of the most serious state and federal charges, our team has the resources and experience to handle high-stakes firearm cases from investigation through trial and appeal.
A federal gun investigation can gain momentum long before an indictment is returned. Reach out to our firm online or call (314) 900-HELP today to discuss your options with a Nevada federal firearm defense lawyer.
