Federal gun charges in Indiana can turn an already serious criminal case into one carrying mandatory prison time, consecutive sentences, firearm forfeiture, and lasting restrictions on your rights. These cases are commonly investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, often alongside federal drug trafficking, conspiracy, robbery, or violent crime allegations.
Federal prosecutors do not always need to prove that a weapon was fired, brandished, or even carried. A case may rest on alleged possession, access to a firearm, a purchase made for another person, inaccurate information on federal paperwork, or the ownership of a regulated weapon. In Indiana, those allegations can substantially increase the punishment tied to a separate federal offense.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte represents clients in Indiana when a federal firearm investigation puts their freedom and future on the line. Our federal criminal defense attorneys serving Indiana dig into the government’s theory from every angle, including where the gun was found, who allegedly controlled it, how officers obtained the evidence, and whether the weapon had any real connection to another offense.
If you have been arrested, received a target letter, learned that ATF agents are investigating you, or believe federal charges may be coming, contact us online or call (314) 900-HELP immediately. What happens before an indictment can shape the entire case.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
Below, we explain:
- What makes a gun charge a federal offense
- What to do if you’re under federal investigation
- Common federal firearm charges
- Mandatory minimums and sentencing enhancements
- The Armed Career Criminal Act
- When to hire a federal gun charges lawyer
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
How Federal Jurisdiction Applies to Gun Cases
The line between a state gun case and a federal prosecution is not always obvious. A case may cross that line because of the weapon involved, the accused person’s legal status, the location of the alleged conduct, or a claimed connection to interstate commerce. Violations of the Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal statute may give the U.S. government authority to prosecute. Local agencies can also refer cases upward when they want federal prosecutors to pursue harsher consequences.
Federal prosecutors may become involved if:
- The firearm crossed state lines or otherwise moved through interstate commerce
- The person accused falls within a federally prohibited category
- The gun was allegedly connected to drug trafficking or a violent offense
- Investigators suspect straw purchases, illegal dealing, smuggling, or trafficking
- The weapon is regulated under federal law, such as a machine gun, suppressor, short-barreled firearm, or destructive device
- The serial number was allegedly altered, removed, or obliterated
- The conduct occurred on federal land or drew the attention of a federal task force
- Agents claim the firearm was tied to a gang, criminal organization, or broader conspiracy
These investigations often run quietly in the background. By the time agents knock, call, or execute a warrant, they may have spent months reviewing phones, social media accounts, purchase records, surveillance, witness statements, and forensic testing.
What to Do During a Federal Firearms Investigation in Indiana
You may need a lawyer long before formal charges appear. Once ATF agents begin asking questions or executing warrants, the investigation may already be well underway. This is not the moment to improvise, explain, or hope the problem disappears on its own.
If you believe you are under investigation for a federal firearm offense:
- Do not try to talk your way out of it. Federal agents are trained interviewers, and even an accurate answer can be taken out of context or compared against other evidence. Tell them you want a federal gun charges attorney in Indiana, then stop answering questions.
- Respect the warrant without surrendering extra ground. Never interfere with a lawful search, but do not sign consent forms or casually authorize agents to search beyond what the warrant permits.
- Preserve records that may tell your side of the story. That may include firearm receipts, transfer documents, text messages, emails, photos, location records, and communications with sellers or buyers.
- Do not contact witnesses or codefendants about the investigation. A message meant to “get everyone on the same page” can be interpreted as witness tampering or obstruction.
- Get legal representation before the government makes the next move. Early intervention may give your attorney time to investigate, preserve favorable evidence, communicate with prosecutors, and prepare for a search, arrest, or indictment.
Common Federal Gun Charges in Indiana
Unlawful Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)
Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), several categories of people are prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition.
A person may be legally barred from possessing a gun or ammunition because of:
- Individuals with certain felony or felony-level convictions
- People accused of fleeing to avoid prosecution
- People considered unlawful users of illegal drugs or other controlled substances
- Individuals covered by certain domestic protection orders
- People convicted of qualifying misdemeanor domestic violence crimes
- Some noncitizens and former service members who received dishonorable discharges
Prosecutors generally must establish that the accused knowingly possessed the firearm or ammunition and knew of the status that made possession unlawful.
Possession may be:
- Direct or actual possession: Agents or officers claim the weapon was in the person’s hand, pocket, waistband, bag, or immediate physical custody.
- Constructive possession: Prosecutors claim the person was not holding the gun but knew it was present and could control what happened to it.
Constructive possession is often disputed when a gun is found in a shared home, borrowed vehicle, hotel room, or another location used by several people.
Possessing a Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Crime or Crime of Violence
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) makes it a separate federal offense to use or carry a firearm during and in relation to a qualifying crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or to possess one in furtherance of such a crime.
A § 924(c) sentence is generally stacked on top of the punishment for the underlying crime rather than served at the same time:
- Five years or more when a firearm was possessed, used, or carried
- Seven years or more when the weapon was allegedly displayed or brandished
- Ten years or more when the gun was fired
- Substantially greater exposure for specially regulated firearms and devices
A § 924(c) theory may rest entirely on where the gun was found. The government often argues that proximity to the following items shows the firearm was kept to further the alleged crime:
- Drugs or suspected drugs
- Cash allegedly connected to sales
- Scales, containers, or packaging materials
- Phones, notebooks, or transaction records
- Additional evidence of an alleged trafficking operation
The defense may challenge whether the accused knew about the firearm, could access it, or possessed it for any reason connected to the alleged offense.
Buying a Firearm for Another Person
The government may call a transaction a straw purchase when it believes the person at the counter was not the firearm’s true purchaser. What looked like a simple favor, gift, or shared shopping trip may be scrutinized through purchase records, ATF Form 4473, and the federal straw purchasing statute.
Questions that may determine whether the transaction was lawful include:
- Whose money funded the transaction
- Who chose the specific gun
- What the purchaser intended when completing the sale
- Whether the weapon was bought as a legitimate gift
- Whether the buyer knew the recipient could not lawfully possess it
Agents may build the case from messages, bank or payment-app records, dealer paperwork, surveillance video, and whatever the purchaser or recipient said during interviews.
Firearms Trafficking
Federal firearms trafficking cases often focus on what the accused knew about the destination or intended use of the weapons. 18 U.S.C. § 933 can apply when firearms are allegedly transferred, transported, or received with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that unlawful conduct will follow.
Conduct that may lead to a federal trafficking charge includes firearms being:
- Bought for someone legally barred from possessing them
- Transported through multiple states or across an international border
- Transferred to people suspected of drug or violent offenses
- Obtained through a chain of straw buyers
- Repeatedly resold outside the federal licensing system
- Exported or smuggled to another country
Selling Guns Without a Federal Firearms License
The legal line between a private seller and an unlicensed firearms dealer depends on the surrounding facts. Federal law generally requires an FFL when someone is engaged in firearm sales as a business, but it does not convert every personal transfer into a federal crime.
Prosecutors may examine:
- The volume and regularity of transactions
- How long the accused kept each firearm before selling it
- Whether buyers were solicited through websites, forums, or personal networks
- Cash, electronic payments, and customer conversations
- Whether the sales produced or were intended to produce profit
- Evidence of inventory, repeat customers, or ongoing operations
Federal Charges for False Firearm Purchase Statements
A mistake on firearm paperwork is not necessarily a federal crime. Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), the government must generally show that the accused knowingly provided false information about something that mattered to the dealer’s decision.
Alleged false statements may involve:
- The identity of the actual purchaser
- A prior criminal conviction
- Controlled substance use
- A domestic violence conviction or restraining order
- Immigration or citizenship status
- Residence or identification information
Possible defenses may focus on confusion, an ambiguous question, an honest mistake, or information that was not material to the transaction. The wording of the form and the accused person’s knowledge at the time can matter greatly.
Federal Charges Involving an Altered Firearm Serial Number
A damaged or missing serial number can create separate federal exposure. Under 27 CFR § 478.34, the government may prosecute certain knowing possession, transportation, or receipt of a firearm with altered identifying marks.
Defense counsel may examine:
- How obvious the serial number damage was
- Whether the markings remained readable
- Whether forensic specialists can restore or identify the number
- Whose fingerprints, DNA, or other evidence connect the weapon to
A firearm with a removed or changed serial number may add another rung to the sentencing ladder through a federal guideline enhancement.
Privately Made Firearms and “Ghost Guns”
Not every homemade firearm violates federal law. The legal trouble often comes from who possessed it, whether it was made or sold as part of a business, whether required markings were present, or whether the gun was tied to separate criminal conduct.
A privately made firearm case may turn on:
- The accused person’s legal ability to possess guns
- Whether the firearm was assembled lawfully
- Any later sale, transfer, or distribution
- Evidence of commercial manufacturing or dealing
- Missing, incomplete, or altered identifying marks
- An alleged connection to trafficking, drugs, or violent crime
A privately made firearm can also affect sentencing if prosecutors claim it lacked markings required by federal law.
Charges Involving Machine Guns, Silencers, and Short-Barreled Firearms
A firearm that is lawful in one configuration can fall under much stricter rules after certain modifications. The National Firearms Act governs several categories of weapons and devices through registration, taxation, transfer, and manufacturing requirements.
Weapons and devices commonly regulated by the NFA include:
- Machine guns
- Shortened rifles
- Shortened shotguns
- Suppressors, including devices commonly called silencers
- Certain bombs, explosives, and destructive devices
- Unusual or concealed weapons classified as “any other weapon”
The issue may be registration, how the weapon was built, how it changed hands, or whether identifying marks were removed. These are felony-level allegations, and a conviction may carry up to 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and loss of the weapon.
Potential Punishment for Federal Weapons Offenses in Indiana
Two people charged with firearm offenses may face very different outcomes. Federal sentencing depends on what prosecutors can prove, which statute applies, whether the law requires consecutive time, the accused’s criminal history, and how the court calculates the advisory guideline range.
| Federal Gun Offense | Maximum or Mandatory Penalty |
|---|---|
| Possessing a gun or ammunition while federally prohibited | Up to 15 years in many cases, with a 15-year mandatory floor when ACCA applies |
| Using, carrying, or possessing a gun in furtherance of another federal crime | At least five years, increased to seven for brandishing or 10 for discharge; the sentence usually runs after the underlying sentence |
| Straw purchasing under 18 U.S.C. § 932 | Up to 15 years, or up to 25 years when the buyer knows or has reason to believe the firearm will be used to commit certain serious crimes |
| Firearms trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 933 | Federal imprisonment for up to 15 years |
| Engaging in the business of firearm sales without federal licensing | Typically punishable by up to five years |
| Knowingly providing material false information to a licensed firearm dealer | As much as a decade in federal custody |
| Federal charges involving an altered firearm serial number | Generally up to five years in federal prison, with possible sentencing enhancements |
| Federal charges involving silencers, short-barreled firearms, machine guns, or other NFA items | Up to 10 years in federal prison, fines, and firearm forfeiture |
| Possessing or transferring a prohibited automatic weapon | Frequently punishable by as much as 10 years, although a connection to drug trafficking or violence can drive the sentence much higher |
The penalties listed above are starting points, not predictions. The sentence in a particular case may rise or fall based on the statute charged, the number and type of weapons, prior convictions, any mandatory minimum, and the calculation required by the federal sentencing guidelines.
Prison is only one possible consequence of a federal firearm conviction. A sentence may also involve:
- Large financial penalties
- A term of federal supervised release following incarceration
- Seizure and forfeiture of guns, ammunition, cash, vehicles, and other alleged proceeds or instrumentalities
- Permanent or long-term restrictions on possessing firearms
- Barriers involving jobs, housing opportunities, and professional credentials
- Removal, inadmissibility, or other immigration problems for noncitizens
A federal sentence is not typically cut short through parole. Although some prisoners can earn good-conduct credit, federal incarceration generally means serving the great majority of the term imposed.
The Armed Career Criminal Act
For some defendants, the biggest battle is not whether § 922(g) applies, but whether the government can trigger the ACCA. That designation replaces the ordinary sentencing range with a mandatory minimum term of 15 years.
ACCA may apply to a person convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) who has three qualifying prior convictions involving violent felonies, serious drug crimes, or some combination of the two, so long as the offenses occurred on different occasions.
ACCA litigation can become highly technical. The court may compare the wording of the prior state statute to the federal definition, review charging papers or plea records, and determine which version of the law controls. A state-law label is not necessarily the final word.
Potential ACCA challenges include:
- Whether the statute of conviction is broader than ACCA’s federal definition
- Whether the government can prove the specific subsection or elements involved
- The timing, location, and relationship between the alleged prior offenses
- Vacatur, expungement, pardon, or other relief affecting a conviction
- Any restoration of civil and firearm rights
The math is unforgiving: the government needs three qualifying predicates. A successful challenge to even one of them may be the difference between an ordinary § 922(g) sentence and at least 15 years in federal prison.
Federal Firearm Sentencing Guideline Enhancements
A firearm case can carry substantial sentencing exposure even without a mandatory minimum. The United States Sentencing Guidelines may recommend a much higher prison range based on specific offense characteristics.
The advisory guideline range may increase if the government proves factors such as:
- Multiple firearms
- Stolen firearms
- Firearms with altered, obliterated, or missing serial numbers
- Trafficking or transferring firearms to prohibited persons
- Possession of a machine gun, silencer, destructive device, or other NFA weapon
- Possession or use of a firearm in connection with another felony
- Reckless endangerment during flight
- A leadership or organizational role
- Obstruction of justice
The advisory guideline range is only one part of the sentencing decision, but it carries significant weight. Defense counsel may dispute factual allegations, challenge the legal basis for enhancements, present mitigating information, and advocate for a sentence below the recommended range.
When Should You Hire a Federal Gun Charges Lawyer in Indiana?
You should contact a federal defense lawyer in Indiana as soon as you believe an investigation may involve you. You do not need to wait for an arrest or indictment.
Warning signs include:
- ATF, FBI, DEA, or another federal agency contacts you
- Agents arrive with a federal search warrant
- A subpoena is issued to someone connected to you
- Firearms, computers, phones, or business records are confiscated
- A federal target letter arrives
- An alleged accomplice or codefendant is taken into custody
- A state prosecution unexpectedly pauses or is dismissed
- You discover federal prosecutors have become involved
The earlier a defense attorney becomes involved, the more options may exist. Depending on the circumstances, counsel can handle communications with investigators, help avoid unnecessary interviews, identify constitutional issues, preserve evidence, assess the strength of the government’s case, and present mitigating information before prosecutors decide whether to seek an indictment.
Call Combs Waterkotte About Your Federal Gun Case
When federal agents and prosecutors are building a gun case, you need counsel familiar with the system from both sides. Combs Waterkotte represents Indiana clients nationwide, and our attorneys include former prosecutors with firsthand knowledge of how federal cases are developed and litigated.
Our defense begins with a hard look at how the case was built. That may mean attacking an unlawful search, exposing weaknesses in witness testimony, disputing possession, and fighting guideline enhancements that could add years to the sentence.
Some cases should be resolved through negotiation. Others demand a courtroom fight. We prepare for both, so every decision is based on strategy rather than pressure.
From investigating the government’s theory to preparing for appeal, our team is equipped for the full life of a federal firearm case. Clients benefit from decades of combined experience, dedicated investigative support, and a record of defending people facing life-changing criminal accusations.
If federal agents are investigating you or charges have already been filed, now is the time to protect yourself. Contact Combs Waterkotte online or call (314) 900-HELP to speak with an experienced federal gun charges attorney serving Indiana.
