Federal gun prosecutions in Sacramento, CA can bring a second wave of exposure to an existing criminal case. Beyond the underlying accusation, you may face additional prison time, sentences that must run back-to-back, seizure of firearms, and restrictions that follow you for years. The ATF and federal prosecutors often use firearm charges to strengthen cases involving drug trafficking, conspiracy, robbery, and violent offenses.
Federal prosecutors do not always need to prove that a weapon was fired, brandished, or even carried. A case may rest on alleged possession, access to a firearm, a purchase made for another person, inaccurate information on federal paperwork, or the ownership of a regulated weapon. In Sacramento, CA, those allegations can substantially increase the punishment tied to a separate federal offense.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
100+ Years
When federal agents and prosecutors set their sights on someone in Sacramento, CA, Combs Waterkotte is prepared to push back. Our federal criminal defense team serving Sacramento, CA looks beyond the fact that a gun was found and asks the questions that can change a case: Who knew it was there? Who could control it? Was the search lawful? Can the government actually connect it to the alleged crime?
You should not wait for an indictment to start protecting yourself. If ATF agents have contacted you, you have received a federal target letter, or you believe an arrest or charge is on the horizon, call (314) 900-HELP or contact Combs Waterkotte online. Early decisions often set the board for everything that follows.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
Below, we explain:
- How firearm allegations enter the federal system
- Steps to take when ATF or federal prosecutors are investigating you
- The gun crimes most often charged in federal court
- How mandatory prison terms and guideline enhancements work
- When the Armed Career Criminal Act may apply
- Why early legal representation matters
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
How Federal Jurisdiction Applies to Gun Cases
Most firearm cases begin under state law. However, a case may enter the federal system when the alleged conduct violates the federal Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, or another federal statute. State and local authorities may also refer a case to federal prosecutors when they believe federal penalties will be more severe.
Federal prosecutors may become involved if:
- The firearm crossed state lines or otherwise moved through interstate commerce
- The person accused falls within a federally prohibited category
- The gun was allegedly connected to drug trafficking or a violent offense
- Investigators suspect straw purchases, illegal dealing, smuggling, or trafficking
- The weapon is regulated under federal law, such as a machine gun, suppressor, short-barreled firearm, or destructive device
- The serial number was allegedly altered, removed, or obliterated
- The conduct occurred on federal land or drew the attention of a federal task force
- Agents claim the firearm was tied to a gang, criminal organization, or broader conspiracy
The first sign of trouble may come late in the investigation. Agents may already have traced the gun, interviewed witnesses, reviewed online activity, pulled phone data, and gathered physical evidence before the accused knows federal prosecutors are involved.
What Should You Do If You’re Under Investigation for a Federal Gun Crime in Sacramento, CA?
You do not have to be arrested to need a federal defense attorney. By the time ATF agents contact you, execute a search warrant, or ask to speak with you, they may have already spent weeks or months building their case. What you do next can significantly affect the outcome.
If you believe you are under investigation for a federal firearm offense:
- Stop talking and call a federal firearms lawyer in Sacramento, CA. You are not required to answer questions simply because an agent sounds friendly or says the conversation is informal. Your right to remain silent exists before an arrest, not just after one.
- Do not expand the search for them. If agents present a warrant, remain calm and do not obstruct them. However, you do not have to volunteer access to additional rooms, devices, vehicles, accounts, or property that the warrant does not cover.
- Save everything. Preserve purchase paperwork, receipts, messages, photographs, transfer records, emails, and anything else that may provide context. Deleting material can create a separate problem and may be portrayed as obstruction.
- Keep the case off the group chat. Do not post online, compare stories with witnesses, or discuss details over calls and text messages. The government may later obtain those communications.
- Bring in counsel early. A federal criminal defense attorney in Sacramento, CA can deal directly with investigators, assess your exposure, and help prevent avoidable damage before charges are filed.
Types of Federal Gun Charges in Sacramento, CA
Unlawful Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)
The phrase “felon in possession” covers only part of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The statute reaches multiple classes of people barred from possessing guns or ammunition, even when the firearm was never fired or displayed.
A person may be legally barred from possessing a gun or ammunition because of:
- People convicted of crimes punishable by more than one year in prison
- Fugitives from justice
- Unlawful users of controlled substances
- Certain people subject to domestic violence restraining orders
- People convicted of qualifying domestic violence offenses
- Certain noncitizens and people dishonorably discharged from the military
A conviction ordinarily requires more than showing that a gun was nearby. The government generally must prove knowing possession and that the accused knew they belonged to the category that prohibited possession.
Federal firearm possession is commonly divided into two categories:
- Physical possession: The firearm was allegedly recovered directly from the accused.
- Constructive possession: The government argues that the accused exercised dominion or control over the firearm even though someone else may have been closer to it.
Constructive possession is often disputed when a gun is found in a shared home, borrowed vehicle, hotel room, or another location used by several people.
Federal Gun Enhancements for Drug and Violent Offenses
A firearm allegation can become its own criminal count when it is tied to certain drug or violent offenses. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), prosecutors may charge a person with using or carrying a gun during a qualifying offense or possessing one to advance that offense.
The statute carries mandatory minimum prison terms that generally run back-to-back with the sentence imposed for the related offense:
- Five years or more when a firearm was possessed, used, or carried
- Seven years or more when the weapon was allegedly displayed or brandished
- Ten years or more when the gun was fired
- Substantially greater exposure for specially regulated firearms and devices
The firearm does not have to be fired. Prosecutors may argue that a gun advanced or protected the alleged crime because it was found near:
- Drugs or suspected drugs
- Cash allegedly connected to sales
- Scales, containers, or packaging materials
- Phones, notebooks, or transaction records
- Additional evidence of an alleged trafficking operation
The key fight may be over the connection between the person, the firearm, and the underlying offense. Defense counsel can challenge whether the accused knew the gun was there, had the ability to reach or control it, or possessed it to advance any criminal activity.
Federal Straw Purchase Charges
The government may call a transaction a straw purchase when it believes the person at the counter was not the firearm’s true purchaser. What looked like a simple favor, gift, or shared shopping trip may be scrutinized through purchase records, ATF Form 4473, and the federal straw purchasing statute.
These cases may depend on:
- Whether another person supplied the purchase money
- Who directed the buyer toward a particular firearm
- Any agreement to transfer the gun after the sale
- The difference between a lawful gift and a purchase made as someone else’s agent
- What the buyer knew about the recipient’s background and intentions
Potential evidence may include text messages, payment records, store surveillance, purchase forms, and statements made to investigators.
Federal Firearms Trafficking Charges
A gun sale does not need to happen in a back alley to draw a federal trafficking charge. Section 933 applies to certain firearm transfers, receipts, and transportation when the accused knew or had reason to believe the weapons would end up in illegal hands.
Conduct that may lead to a federal trafficking charge includes firearms being:
- Bought for someone legally barred from possessing them
- Transported through multiple states or across an international border
- Transferred to people suspected of drug or violent offenses
- Obtained through a chain of straw buyers
- Repeatedly resold outside the federal licensing system
- Exported or smuggled to another country
Selling Guns Without a Federal Firearms License
The legal line between a private seller and an unlicensed firearms dealer depends on the surrounding facts. Federal law generally requires an FFL when someone is engaged in firearm sales as a business, but it does not convert every personal transfer into a federal crime.
To argue that someone was acting as a dealer, the government may look at:
- The volume and regularity of transactions
- How long the accused kept each firearm before selling it
- Whether buyers were solicited through websites, forums, or personal networks
- Cash, electronic payments, and customer conversations
- Whether the sales produced or were intended to produce profit
- Evidence of inventory, repeat customers, or ongoing operations
Lying on a Federal Firearm Purchase Form
A knowingly false answer given during a firearm transaction can lead to federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) if the information mattered to whether the dealer could lawfully complete the sale.
The disputed answer may concern:
- The identity of the actual purchaser
- A prior criminal conviction
- Controlled substance use
- A domestic violence conviction or restraining order
- Immigration or citizenship status
- Residence or identification information
The defense may challenge whether the answer was actually false, whether the accused knowingly provided incorrect information, and whether the statement affected the legality of the transaction.
Federal Charges Involving an Altered Firearm Serial Number
Under 27 CFR § 478.34, federal law prohibits knowingly transporting, receiving, or possessing certain firearms with serial numbers that have been removed, altered, or obliterated.
Important questions may include:
- Knowledge of the damaged serial number
- The degree and legal significance of the alteration
- Whether experts can recover the firearm’s identifying information
- Whether the gun was actually possessed or controlled by the accused
A firearm with a removed or changed serial number may add another rung to the sentencing ladder through a federal guideline enhancement.
“Ghost Gun” Investigations
Building or assembling a gun for personal use does not, by itself, automatically make the firearm illegal. Federal problems involving a privately made firearm usually depend on the person involved, the weapon’s configuration, and what happened after it was made.
A privately made firearm case may turn on:
- The accused person’s legal ability to possess guns
- Whether the firearm was assembled lawfully
- Any later sale, transfer, or distribution
- Evidence of commercial manufacturing or dealing
- Missing, incomplete, or altered identifying marks
- An alleged connection to trafficking, drugs, or violent crime
Unserialized firearms may bring an additional sentencing problem, particularly when the federal guidelines call for an enhancement.
National Firearms Act Violations
The NFA creates a separate federal framework for weapons lawmakers placed under heightened regulation. Compliance may involve registration, tax payments, transfer approval, and manufacturing rules.
NFA-regulated firearms include:
- Fully automatic firearms and machine guns
- Rifles with barrels or overall lengths below federal limits
- Short-barreled shotguns
- Firearm silencers and suppressors
- Explosive or other qualifying destructive devices
- Weapons falling within the federal “any other weapon” category
The issue may be registration, how the weapon was built, how it changed hands, or whether identifying marks were removed. These are felony-level allegations, and a conviction may carry up to 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and loss of the weapon.
Penalties for Federal Gun Charges in Sacramento, CA
Two people charged with firearm offenses may face very different outcomes. Federal sentencing depends on what prosecutors can prove, which statute applies, whether the law requires consecutive time, the accused’s criminal history, and how the court calculates the advisory guideline range.
| Type of Federal Firearm Case | Maximum or Mandatory Penalty |
|---|---|
| Possessing a gun or ammunition while federally prohibited | Up to 15 years in many cases, with a 15-year mandatory floor when ACCA applies |
| Possessing, carrying, or using a firearm during a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence under § 924(c) | Mandatory minimum of five years, seven years if brandished, or 10 years if discharged, generally served consecutively |
| Misrepresenting the true buyer of a firearm | As much as 15 years, with enhanced exposure of up to 25 years in qualifying aggravated cases |
| Trafficking firearms to prohibited or unlawful recipients | Up to 15 years in federal prison |
| Selling guns as a business without an FFL | Generally a five-year maximum term of imprisonment |
| Knowingly providing material false information to a licensed firearm dealer | A maximum sentence of 10 years |
| Possessing a firearm with an altered or obliterated serial number under § 922(k) | Typically punishable by as much as five years, and the serial-number issue may also raise the guideline range |
| Illegal possession, manufacture, or transfer of an NFA-regulated firearm | As much as 10 years of imprisonment along with fines and forfeiture |
| Illegal machine gun possession or transfer | Often up to 10 years, with substantially greater exposure when connected to a drug trafficking crime or crime of violence |
The final sentencing picture is assembled from several moving parts. The charge itself matters, but so do the quantity and characteristics of the firearms, the defendant’s record, any required minimum term, and the guideline calculations used in federal court.
Additional penalties and long-term consequences may include:
- Fines and court-ordered financial obligations
- Post-release supervision with strict federal conditions
- Forfeiture of the firearm and other property allegedly connected to the offense
- The loss of federal firearm rights
- Difficulty finding employment, securing housing, or keeping a professional license
- Serious immigration consequences, including possible deportation exposure
The federal system does not offer traditional parole. While eligible prisoners may earn limited good-conduct credit, a federal sentence usually requires serving most of the term imposed by the court.
Federal Gun Charges and the ACCA
A standard felon-in-possession prosecution can take a drastic turn when prosecutors invoke the Armed Career Criminal Act. If the enhancement applies, the sentencing floor becomes 15 years in federal prison.
A § 922(g) defendant may face the enhancement when their record includes three prior offenses that satisfy ACCA’s federal definitions and were not all part of the same criminal occasion.
Whether a prior conviction qualifies is frequently disputed. Courts must analyze the statute underlying the earlier conviction, the available court records, and evolving federal case law. The label placed on a state offense does not always determine whether it counts under the ACCA.
An experienced Sacramento, CA federal gun charges lawyer may challenge:
- Whether the statute of conviction is broader than ACCA’s federal definition
- Whether the government can prove the specific subsection or elements involved
- The timing, location, and relationship between the alleged prior offenses
- Vacatur, expungement, pardon, or other relief affecting a conviction
- Any restoration of civil and firearm rights
When three qualifying convictions are required, knocking out one may knock out the entire 15-year mandatory minimum. That can completely reshape the sentencing landscape.
Federal Sentencing Enhancements in Sacramento, CA Firearm Cases
A firearm case can carry substantial sentencing exposure even without a mandatory minimum. The United States Sentencing Guidelines may recommend a much higher prison range based on specific offense characteristics.
Federal prosecutors may seek sentencing increases based on allegations such as:
- Large numbers of firearms
- Stolen weapons
- Altered or obliterated serial numbers
- Trafficking-related conduct
- Machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, or similar regulated weapons
- Firearm possession connected to another felony
- Reckless endangerment while fleeing
- Acting as an organizer or leader
- Obstruction of justice allegations
Although the guidelines are no longer mandatory, federal judges are still required to calculate and consider them before imposing sentence. An experienced defense attorney may contest proposed enhancements, introduce favorable evidence, request departures or variances, and argue that a lower sentence better satisfies federal sentencing law.
When Should You Hire a Federal Gun Charges Lawyer in Sacramento, CA?
The best time to hire a federal gun charges attorney is usually before formal charges are filed. If you believe federal agents are investigating you, waiting for an indictment may cost valuable opportunities.
You should take the situation seriously if:
- ATF, FBI, DEA, or task force agents attempt to question you
- Agents execute a search warrant at your home or business
- Someone close to you receives a subpoena
- Law enforcement seizes firearms, phones, computers, or records
- You receive a federal target letter
- A codefendant or alleged associate is arrested
- A state firearm case is dismissed or delayed without explanation
- You learn that federal prosecutors are reviewing your case
An early defense strategy is often very different from a trial strategy. Before an indictment, counsel may be able to communicate with federal agents, protect you from making damaging statements, investigate the facts, analyze search and seizure issues, and provide prosecutors with information that could influence charging decisions.
Contact Combs Waterkotte About Federal Gun Charges in Sacramento, CA
Combs Waterkotte defends clients from Sacramento, CA and across the country against serious federal criminal allegations. Our team includes former prosecutors who know how the government builds firearm cases from the investigation through trial.
Every case is prepared with the possibility of trial in mind. We examine the government’s evidence piece by piece, challenge illegal searches, test the reliability of witnesses, and oppose sentencing enhancements that the facts or law do not support.
If a negotiated resolution serves your interests, we pursue it with leverage built through preparation. If the government will not offer a fair outcome, we are ready to litigate the case in court.
Our firm brings decades of combined defense experience, an in-house investigator, and a history of handling severe state and federal allegations. We have the personnel and resources to defend firearm cases at every stage, including investigation, indictment, trial, sentencing, and appeal.
If you are under investigation or have been charged with a federal gun offense, don’t wait to protect your rights. Contact us online or call (314) 900-HELP today to discuss your case with an experienced Sacramento, CA federal gun charges lawyer.
