Federal Fraud Attorney Serving Wisconsin. Federal fraud cases often begin quietly. A subpoena arrives at a business. Agents ask to “clear up” one payment. A bank freezes funds. A former employee receives a visit. By the time the investigation becomes visible, prosecutors may already have months or years of emails, invoices, applications, claims, contracts, and transfers arranged into a theory of deliberate deception.
That theory can look tidy because the government decides which records sit next to each other. The defense has to restore what was left out: the rest of the email thread, the work that was actually performed, the advice someone relied on, the pressure surrounding a business decision, and the difference between a venture that failed and a plan that was fraudulent from the beginning.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte defends clients in Wisconsin and throughout the country against federal fraud allegations. Our clients include individuals, businesses, executives, licensed professionals, and health care providers. The firm’s federal criminal defense lawyers can communicate with agents and prosecutors, investigate before indictment, examine the evidence in context, file motions, negotiate, and prepare for trial or sentencing.
Discuss the investigation with Combs Waterkotte during a free, confidential case review. Call (314) 900-HELP or reach out online.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
Topics addressed on this page include:
- how an accusation of fraud can trigger federal jurisdiction;
- the primary and companion offenses that can arise from the same federal investigation;
- how federal fraud investigations, indictments, and sentencing work; and
- how the defense may challenge the government’s theory, the collection of evidence, cooperating witnesses, and the loss figure.
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
How Can a Fraud Allegation in Wisconsin Become a Federal Case?
There is no single charge called “federal fraud.” Prosecutors need a federal statute that covers the alleged conduct and gives the federal courts jurisdiction. The connection may come from the communication method, the institution involved, the source of the money, the type of program, or the reach of the alleged scheme.
A fraud investigation may enter federal court when it involves:
- electronic messages, calls, transfers, websites, or payment systems used in interstate commerce;
- use of the U.S. mail or a commercial carrier operating across state lines;
- an allegation involving a federally protected bank, lender, or credit union;
- money connected to Medicare, Medicaid, federal aid, disaster assistance, procurement, or federally insured loans;
- regulated investment activity, market information, or the purchase and sale of covered financial products;
- an allegedly false certification, application, statement, or document presented to the federal government; or
- a broad alleged scheme involving multiple states, countries, businesses, accounts, or defendants.
The federal link can be surprisingly ordinary for people and businesses in Wisconsin. An electronic payment or overnight delivery may satisfy a jurisdictional requirement, but it does not establish that the transaction was dishonest. Prosecutors still have to prove the charged scheme, the defendant’s knowledge, and the required intent.
Types of Federal Fraud Charges in Wisconsin
Federal prosecutors often choose charges based on how an alleged scheme operated rather than the everyday label someone might use for it. A dispute described as billing fraud, mortgage fraud, investment fraud, or internet fraud may be charged through one or several broader federal statutes. Fraud is one branch of the broader federal white-collar cases Combs Waterkotte handles for clients in Wisconsin and nationwide.
- Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343: Federal charges based on the alleged use of digital communications, electronic payments, or other interstate wires to execute a fraudulent scheme.
- Mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1341: Charges claiming that the U.S. mail or a private carrier was used to send documents, payments, or packages connected to alleged fraud.
- Bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1344: Prosecutions based on an alleged plan to defraud a bank or acquire funds held by a financial institution through materially false information.
- Loan and credit application fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1014: Investigations involving statements in loan, credit, refinancing, or related applications that prosecutors claim were material and intentionally false.
- Health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1347: Cases involving billing, coding, prescriptions, referrals, medical necessity, kickbacks, patient services, or claims submitted to public or private health benefit programs.
- Securities and commodities fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1348: Cases involving investor disclosures, trading activity, offering materials, valuations, market information, or the sale of covered securities and commodities.
- Government contract, grant, and benefit fraud: Allegations involving procurement documents, certifications, invoices, eligibility information, disaster relief, federally funded programs, or money belonging to the United States.
- Federal tax fraud and tax crimes: Federal investigations focused on returns, records, income, deductions, employment taxes, or transactions the government believes were designed to evade tax.
- Access device fraud and computer fraud: Cases involving account credentials, credit cards, devices, protected computers, business networks, data, or allegedly unauthorized access.
- Honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1346: A limited theory of fraud generally tied to allegations that bribery or kickbacks corrupted a duty owed to an employer, organization, or the public.
Dozens of counts do not necessarily mean dozens of unrelated events. Prosecutors often divide one alleged scheme into separate communications and transactions. Defense strategy must examine what each count requires, which evidence supports it, and whether the broad accusation survives when its pieces are tested individually.
The federal system operates under different procedures, charging practices, judges, sentencing rules, and local court requirements. Learn more about the differences between federal and state criminal cases.
What Does the Government Have to Prove in Federal Fraud Cases in Wisconsin?
The elements depend on the statute. Mail fraud is not identical to bank fraud. Health care fraud differs from a false statement charge. Still, many federal fraud cases involving Wisconsin revolve around several recurring questions:
- Can prosecutors prove the existence of the scheme described in the indictment, including its objective and operation?
- Did the accused understand the alleged plan and choose to take part in it?
- Does the evidence show a deliberate plan to cheat someone, as opposed to a misunderstanding, business failure, careless act, or good-faith decision?
- Was the representation actually false, and was it significant enough to affect the person or institution receiving it?
- Is there proof of the jurisdictional element that makes the alleged conduct a federal offense rather than a state or civil matter?
Could Federal Agents Be Investigating Fraud in Wisconsin?
Federal investigations often become visible indirectly. Someone else receives a subpoena, an account is frozen, or agents begin asking questions before the person under scrutiny receives formal notice.
- A federal target letter, grand jury subpoena, or formal demand for testimony or documents arrived.
- Federal agents contacted you at home, at work, by phone, or through another person.
- A subpoena was delivered to a bank, accountant, employer, clinic, vendor, customer, or business associate connected to you.
- Federal agents searched a home, office, clinic, or other location and took electronic devices, files, or records.
- A financial institution restricted access to an account, or the government identified funds in a seizure or forfeiture notice.
- An audit or civil inquiry began focusing on intent, communications, certifications, or individual responsibility.
- Witnesses told you they had been interviewed about your role, communications, transactions, or business practices.
- An investigator asked you to attend an interview, proffer, or informal meeting to explain a transaction.
Federal agents working in Wisconsin may describe a conversation as informal even when every answer matters. They often ask questions after reviewing the records, which means an inaccurate recollection can become an apparent contradiction. A knowingly false statement can also lead to a separate charge regardless of whether the fraud accusation holds up.
Federal Fraud Defense Strategies for Wisconsin Cases
No defense theory should be copied from another case. For a client in Wisconsin, the strategy must fit the charged elements and the evidence the government actually has. It may dismantle the broad accusation, isolate unsupported counts, or do both at once.
There Was No Intent to Defraud
Fraud requires more than an error, a failed prediction, or a questionable business choice. Evidence that the accused sought professional advice, communicated openly, delivered value, or acted in good faith may show that deception was never the objective.
Selected Records Distort the Full Story
Prosecutors may rely on a narrow date range, one document version, or a fragment of a conversation. Defense investigation restores what came before and after, including missing communications and testimony from people who understood the process. The meaning of the evidence can shift once the complete record is visible.
The Alleged Representation Was Accurate or Immaterial
Not every discrepancy is a material lie. The defense can examine who supplied the information, what the words meant in context, whether the recipient relied on them, and whether an estimate was honestly made. Those questions may undercut both falsity and materiality.
The Accused Did Not Knowingly Join the Scheme
Federal cases often involve many people, but contact with an alleged participant does not prove agreement. The government must show that the accused understood the fraudulent plan and chose to take part, not merely that the accused worked nearby or completed a routine task.
The Informant’s Account Is Unreliable
Someone who is under investigation may gain by assigning responsibility to another person. Promised benefits, pressure from prosecutors, inconsistent versions, and conflicts with financial or digital records can all bear on credibility.
The Alleged Conduct Does Not Fit the Federal Statute
The case does not belong in federal court merely because investigators used federal resources. Prosecutors must establish the specific jurisdictional fact required by the offense, whether it is a wire, mailing, bank, benefit program, or other federal interest.
The Search or Interrogation Violated Constitutional Rights
A federal investigation does not eliminate constitutional limits. The defense can examine the warrant affidavit, the places searched, the data seized, and the circumstances of any interview. An unlawful search or statement may lead to suppression. More information is available in our guide to Fourth Amendment defenses.
The Alleged Financial Harm Is Miscalculated
Loss calculations often combine assumptions about causation, intent, victim impact, and the scope of the alleged scheme. The defense can test each assumption and determine whether credits, collateral, returned funds, or another participant’s conduct improperly increased the total.
What Happens During a Federal Fraud Case?
A federal fraud investigation connected to Wisconsin does not always lead to an indictment. When charges are filed, however, the case often progresses through a recognizable series of stages:
- Investigation: The case may begin with record demands, interviews, surveillance, search warrants, financial analysis, or cooperation from another person. Early defense work can clarify the client’s status and determine whether pre-indictment advocacy is possible.
- Grand jury proceedings: Prosecutors may use the grand jury to subpoena testimony and records. If the grand jury finds probable cause, it can return an indictment.
- Initial appearance and release decision: The first court appearance typically addresses the right to counsel, the charges, and pretrial release. The government may seek detention or request restrictions on travel, finances, or communication.
- Arraignment and discovery: The court takes a plea to the indictment, and prosecutors produce discoverable material. The defense must organize what may be an enormous collection of communications, transactions, witness statements, and device data.
- Motions and expert review: The defense may challenge searches, statements, indictment defects, expert methods, evidence admissibility, or discovery failures. Accountants and other experts may analyze disputed transactions or losses.
- Negotiation or trial preparation: The parties may discuss charging changes, plea terms, proffers, or sentencing positions. At the same time, the defense prepares witnesses, exhibits, cross-examination, and trial themes.
- Trial, sentencing, and appeal: At trial, the burden remains on the government to prove each charged element beyond a reasonable doubt. A plea or guilty verdict moves the case to sentencing, while appeal may be available for certain preserved errors and rulings.
Sentencing Exposure in Federal Fraud Cases
Someone facing federal fraud charges in Wisconsin may see decades of possible imprisonment listed in the statutes. Those maximums define the outer limit, not the sentence that will automatically be imposed. The counts of conviction, criminal history, advisory guidelines, judicial findings, and federal sentencing factors shape the actual result.
| Federal Charge | Statutory Sentencing Range |
|---|---|
| Mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1341 | Up to 20 years in prison for a standard offense. The maximum can reach 30 years when the violation affects a financial institution or falls within specified emergency or disaster benefit provisions. |
| Wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1343 | Up to 20 years in prison for a standard offense, with a potential 30-year maximum in specified financial institution or emergency-benefit cases. |
| Bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1344 | A bank fraud conviction can carry up to 30 years in prison, along with a fine of as much as $1,000,000. |
| Health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1347 | The penalty can reach 10 years for an ordinary offense, 20 years if the conduct results in serious bodily injury, and life imprisonment if it results in death. |
| Securities and commodities fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1348 | A conviction can carry a prison term of as much as 25 years, in addition to possible fines, restitution, and forfeiture. |
| False statements, 18 U.S.C. 1001 | A false statement conviction generally carries up to five years in prison, subject to the statute’s different treatment of specified proceedings and offenses. |
| Aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. 1028A | The statute generally requires an additional two years of imprisonment to be served consecutively to the sentence imposed for the predicate felony. |
| Fraud attempt or conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. 1349 | The statutory maximum follows the fraud crime the defendant allegedly attempted or agreed to commit. |
For federal fraud matters connected to Wisconsin, Guideline Section 2B1.1 commonly provides the starting point. The government’s loss figure may increase the offense level, while additional adjustments can involve victims, role, sophisticated means, trust, obstruction, acceptance of responsibility, and jointly attributed conduct.
Restitution and forfeiture are separate questions from guideline loss, even when the government uses similar numbers. The figures may differ. The court can also consider personal history, health, family responsibilities, conduct after the offense, and the need for a sentence that is sufficient without being greater than necessary.
Learn more about the federal sentencing process and the circumstances in which probation may be possible in a federal case.
Steps to Take After Federal Agents Contact You in Wisconsin
An unexpected fraud inquiry can feel so wrong that answering seems harmless. The safer response is to pause, preserve the record, and understand the investigation before speaking.
- Speak with counsel before accepting an interview request. You may tell investigators that you will not answer questions until you have legal representation.
- Never improvise an answer. If you do not know or do not remember, guessing can create a contradiction. A knowingly false statement may become a separate federal offense.
- Do not delete, alter, backdate, or hide records. Implement careful preservation for paper records, accounts, messages, backups, and devices.
- Do not contact witnesses to coordinate explanations. Even a well-intended message can be portrayed as pressure or obstruction.
- Do not answer the allegation through a mass email. A broad message can be forwarded, misunderstood, or delivered directly to someone working with the government.
- Do not discard the envelope, card, or instructions. Small details such as service dates, names, deadlines, and item inventories may matter later.
- Get legal advice about every deadline and requested production. The proper response depends on what was served, when it was received, and which records or testimony the government seeks.
- Contact a federal fraud defense lawyer in Wisconsin immediately. A lawyer may be able to clarify your status, review government demands, and present information before prosecutors make final charging decisions.
Why Choose Combs Waterkotte for Federal Fraud Defense in Wisconsin?
A federal fraud defense team serving Wisconsin must be comfortable with dense records and high-stakes courtroom decisions. It also must understand the client’s work, priorities, and exposure. The financial story and the human story both matter.
- More than 80 years of combined legal experience: Our team has spent decades defending high-stakes cases in both federal and state courts.
- More than 10,000 cases handled and over one million jail days saved: That volume helps our lawyers recognize recurring weaknesses, overlooked facts, and opportunities to improve the client’s position.
- More than 500 perfect Google reviews: People facing serious investigations have repeatedly turned to the firm for responsive guidance and determined representation.
- Early intervention: Early counsel may clarify whether the client is a witness, subject, or target and can begin preserving evidence while charging decisions remain open.
- A full defense team: Complex cases may require lawyers, investigators, paralegals, law clerks, accountants, computer specialists, and other professionals working from one defense plan.
- Trial preparation from the beginning: Every count is evaluated with trial in mind, even while the team pursues dismissal, pre-indictment advocacy, or a negotiated outcome. That readiness creates leverage throughout the case.
- Client-centered communication: Clients have access to the people handling the matter and receive straightforward guidance about what is happening and what comes next. The firm is available around the clock for urgent developments.
Other federal cases we take on include:
Contact a Federal Fraud Defense Attorney in Wisconsin
Federal fraud allegations connected to Wisconsin can be addressed before charges, after indictment, during negotiations, or at trial. The earlier the defense begins examining the documents and government’s theory, the more options may remain available.
Call (314) 900-HELP or request a free, confidential consultation with Combs Waterkotte online.
