Federal Fraud Defense Lawyer in New York. A federal fraud investigation may be underway long before anyone calls it a criminal case. One company receives a subpoena. Someone else is asked about a payment. Funds are frozen, records are collected, and former employees are interviewed. When prosecutors finally reveal their theory, they may have already spent months assembling ordinary business documents into an accusation of intentional fraud.
Prosecutors control the first draft of the story. They can place selected invoices beside selected messages and make a complicated business history look deliberate. The defense must recover the missing context, including completed work, professional advice, surrounding communications, and the facts that separate a failed venture from a fraudulent plan.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte represents individuals and organizations in New York, including executives, professionals, business owners, and health care providers, in federal fraud investigations and prosecutions across the United States. Our federal criminal defense lawyers can intervene before indictment, take over communication with agents and prosecutors, examine the government’s evidence against the full record, and prepare the case for motions, negotiation, trial, or sentencing.
Call (314) 900-HELP or contact Combs Waterkotte online for a free, confidential case review.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
This page explains:
- when alleged fraud can become a federal criminal case;
- the federal fraud charges and companion offenses prosecutors commonly use;
- what happens from the investigation stage through indictment and sentencing; and
- how Combs Waterkotte challenges intent, evidence, witnesses, searches, and loss calculations.
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
When Can Prosecutors Bring Federal Fraud Charges in New York?
An accusation does not become federal merely because prosecutors call it fraud. The government needs a specific criminal statute and a factual connection that places the case within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The alleged use of wires or mail, the source of funds, the institution affected, and the scope of the activity can all matter.
Common federal connections in fraud investigations include:
- electronic messages, calls, transfers, websites, or payment systems used in interstate commerce;
- use of the U.S. mail or a commercial carrier operating across state lines;
- a federally insured bank, lender, credit union, or financial institution;
- money connected to Medicare, Medicaid, federal aid, disaster assistance, procurement, or federally insured loans;
- regulated investment activity, market information, or the purchase and sale of covered financial products;
- false statements or documents submitted to a federal agency; or
- activity extending across state or national borders, multiple entities, several accounts, or a group of alleged participants.
A company operating in New York may use interstate systems every day without thinking about federal jurisdiction. One email, card transaction, bank transfer, or shipped package can give prosecutors the connection required by a statute. That connection opens the courthouse door; it does not prove fraudulent intent or any other element of the offense.
Types of Federal Fraud Charges in New York
What begins as an allegation of investment, mortgage, billing, or business fraud in New York may be prosecuted under several broad federal statutes. The government often charges the communications, payments, and agreements surrounding the alleged conduct. Fraud defense is part of the nationwide federal white-collar practice at Combs Waterkotte.
- Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343: Federal charges based on the alleged use of digital communications, electronic payments, or other interstate wires to execute a fraudulent scheme.
- Mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1341: Prosecutions built around a mailing or commercial delivery that the government claims helped execute or conceal a scheme.
- Bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1344: Claims that someone knowingly tried to defraud a financial institution or obtain bank-controlled property through false representations.
- Loan and credit application fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1014: Accusations involving materially false statements made to influence a covered lender, bank, or federal credit institution.
- Health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1347: Cases involving billing, coding, prescriptions, referrals, medical necessity, kickbacks, patient services, or claims submitted to public or private health benefit programs.
- Securities and commodities fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1348: Cases involving investor disclosures, trading activity, offering materials, valuations, market information, or the sale of covered securities and commodities.
- Government contract, grant, and benefit fraud: Accusations tied to certifications, applications, billing, or eligibility for money administered, backed, or owned by the federal government.
- Federal tax fraud and tax crimes: Accusations that a taxpayer or business knowingly concealed income, misstated deductions, failed to remit payroll taxes, or otherwise acted willfully.
- Access device fraud and computer fraud: Cases involving account credentials, credit cards, devices, protected computers, business networks, data, or allegedly unauthorized access.
- Honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1346: Charges claiming that a person accepted or offered bribes or kickbacks and thereby deprived another party of the right to honest services.
Federal fraud cases can multiply quickly because each communication or transaction may support another count. A single alleged plan may therefore produce charges tied to separate payments, messages, applications, or deliveries. The defense has to pull the indictment apart without losing sight of the larger theory.
A federal prosecution does not follow the same path as a state case. Its agencies, prosecutors, courts, discovery practices, and sentencing framework are different. Our guide explains what makes federal criminal cases distinct.
How Prosecutors Try to Prove Federal Fraud in New York
There is no universal checklist for federal fraud because each statute defines its own crime. For cases connected to New York, however, prosecutors commonly must answer a familiar set of questions about the scheme, the defendant’s knowledge, the alleged falsehood, and federal jurisdiction:
- Did the evidence establish a plan aimed at obtaining money, property, or another legally protected interest?
- Did the accused knowingly participate in that scheme?
- Did the accused act with an intent to defraud rather than through mistake, negligence, confusion, or good faith?
- Can the government prove that a statement, promise, or omission was misleading and material, not merely ambiguous, incomplete, or immaterial?
- Did the alleged activity involve the specific federal link identified in the charge, such as interstate communications or a covered institution?
Could Federal Agents Be Investigating Fraud in New York?
An indictment is not the beginning of every federal fraud case. Frequently, the first warning arrives through a bank, employer, colleague, accountant, or business partner.
- A federal target letter, grand jury subpoena, or formal demand for testimony or documents arrived.
- Someone from a federal agency requested an interview, appeared unexpectedly, or left a card asking you to call.
- A third party that holds your financial, business, employment, or medical-practice records was ordered to produce documents.
- Agents executed a search warrant or seized phones, computers, files, or business records.
- A bank account was restrained, frozen, or named in a forfeiture notice.
- Questions in an audit began emphasizing personal knowledge, certifications, emails, and the reasons behind particular decisions.
- Agents began questioning people around you, including colleagues, employees, customers, patients, investors, or family members.
- You were invited to a meeting, interview, or proffer to give your side of a payment, application, claim, or transaction.
An invitation to “clear something up” in New York should not be mistaken for a harmless chat. Investigators may already possess emails, financial records, and witness accounts. Answering from memory can create discrepancies, and an intentionally false response can become its own federal offense.
Defending Against Federal Fraud Allegations in New York
A useful defense for clients in New York grows from the charged statute and the actual evidence. It may challenge the government’s entire theory or narrow a case count by count.
There Was No Intent to Defraud
The record may show honest work rather than a scheme: services were performed, problems were disclosed, corrections were attempted, and decisions were made using information believed to be true. Those facts can support a good-faith defense and weaken proof of fraudulent intent.
Selected Records Distort the Full Story
A cropped message, partial ledger, draft document, or selected date range can create a story that changes when the full record appears. The defense can reconstruct timelines, recover missing communications, compare versions, interview the people who understood the process, and show why a seemingly suspicious entry existed.
Ambiguity Is Not Fraud
The document may have been accurate, ambiguous, based on a reasonable interpretation, or completed by someone else. A prediction or estimate may have been presented honestly even though events turned out differently. Some statutes require proof that the alleged falsehood was material to the decision or transaction at issue.
The Defendant Was Not Part of the Alleged Plan
Working for the same company, processing a payment, or appearing in a message thread does not establish knowing participation. Large investigations can sweep in employees and professionals whose work touched a transaction but who never agreed to defraud anyone.
The Informant’s Account Is Unreliable
A witness may be facing charges, seeking leniency, protecting a license, or trying to preserve a business. Prior inconsistent statements, personal benefits, missing records, and contradictions between testimony and data can expose an unreliable account.
The Required Federal Connection Is Missing
Jurisdiction can become an overlooked element when the alleged scheme receives most of the attention. The defense should require proof that the charged conduct actually used or affected the federal channel, institution, or program named in the statute.
The Search or Interrogation Violated Constitutional Rights
A federal investigation does not eliminate constitutional limits. The defense can examine the warrant affidavit, the places searched, the data seized, and the circumstances of any interview. An unlawful search or statement may lead to suppression. More information is available in our guide to Fourth Amendment defenses.
The Alleged Financial Harm Is Miscalculated
Fraud cases can change dramatically when the loss figure is corrected. The government’s calculation may ignore services delivered, money returned, collateral, credits, causation, or limits on jointly undertaken conduct. It may also attribute transactions to a defendant who neither caused nor agreed to them.
The Federal Fraud Case Process
A federal fraud investigation connected to New York does not always lead to an indictment. When charges are filed, however, the case often progresses through a recognizable series of stages:
- Investigation: Investigators build the file through documents, digital evidence, witness accounts, subpoenas, and searches. Before charges are final, counsel may be able to manage communications and show prosecutors evidence their theory overlooks.
- Grand jury proceedings: Grand jury proceedings allow prosecutors to seek records, question witnesses, and request an indictment. Defense counsel generally does not participate in the presentation, which makes preparation for subpoenaed testimony especially important.
- Initial appearance and release decision: Soon after the accused enters federal custody, the court determines whether release is appropriate and what conditions will apply while the case is pending.
- Arraignment and discovery: After the initial proceedings, the defense receives the government’s evidence and begins comparing the indictment with the documents, financial analyses, interviews, and digital records.
- Motions and expert review: Defense counsel may file motions to suppress or exclude evidence, seek additional discovery, attack defects in the indictment, and challenge the government’s experts. Accountants, computer specialists, or industry professionals can help examine complex proof.
- Negotiation or trial preparation: The government and defense may explore a resolution, but preparation cannot pause. Counsel must evaluate plea terms and sentencing exposure while developing the factual themes and courtroom strategy needed for trial.
- Trial, sentencing, and appeal: At trial, the burden remains on the government to prove each charged element beyond a reasonable doubt. A plea or guilty verdict moves the case to sentencing, while appeal may be available for certain preserved errors and rulings.
Sentencing Exposure in Federal Fraud Cases
Federal fraud statutes carry serious maximum penalties, but the statutory maximum is not a prediction of the sentence for a person charged in New York. The charged counts, criminal history, advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines, facts found by the court, and the factors in federal sentencing law all affect the outcome.
| Federal Statute | General Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|
| Mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1341 | A standard mail fraud conviction carries a maximum of 20 years. The statute permits up to 30 years in qualifying cases involving a financial institution or specified emergency or disaster benefits. |
| Wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1343 | Up to 20 years in prison for a standard offense, with a potential 30-year maximum in specified financial institution or emergency-benefit cases. |
| Bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1344 | Up to 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $1,000,000. |
| Health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1347 | Up to 10 years in prison for the standard offense, up to 20 years if serious bodily injury results, and up to life if death results. |
| Securities and commodities fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1348 | Up to 25 years in prison, along with potential fines, restitution, and forfeiture. |
| False statements, 18 U.S.C. 1001 | Federal false statements are commonly punishable by as much as five years, with other maximums applying in the circumstances identified in the statute. |
| Aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. 1028A | A two-year prison term that generally runs consecutively to the sentence for the underlying felony. |
| Fraud attempt or conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. 1349 | The same penalties prescribed for the fraud offense that was attempted or was the object of the conspiracy. |
In many fraud cases arising in New York, the advisory guideline calculation begins with Section 2B1.1. The alleged loss can raise the offense level. Other disputes may involve the number of victims, a person’s role, sophisticated means, abuse of trust, obstruction, acceptance of responsibility, and relevant conduct attributed from other participants.
Guideline loss, restitution, and forfeiture may draw from the same transactions, but they are not interchangeable calculations. Each can produce a different number. Sentencing also allows the court to consider the defendant’s history, medical needs, family circumstances, post-offense conduct, and whether a lesser sentence is sufficient.
Read more about how federal sentencing works and when probation may be available for a federal offense.
What to Do if Federal Agents Contact You About Fraud in New York
When an accusation makes no sense, the natural response is to explain everything immediately. In a federal investigation, that impulse can create new evidence before you know what the agents already possess.
- Pause before meeting with agents. You can respectfully decline the discussion and direct future contact through counsel.
- Avoid both false statements and uncertain speculation. Federal agents may compare every answer with records already in their possession. Remaining silent is safer than supplying information you cannot verify.
- Do not delete, alter, backdate, or hide records. Deleting or modifying information can destroy helpful context and create allegations of obstruction.
- Do not compare stories with potential witnesses. Communications about testimony can be misunderstood and may create an issue separate from the fraud investigation.
- Keep the internal response controlled and deliberate. A broad message can be forwarded, misunderstood, or delivered directly to someone working with the government.
- Preserve all papers and messages received from investigators. Keep copies of every letter, subpoena, warrant, receipt, inventory, agent card, email, and delivery envelope.
- Get legal advice about every deadline and requested production. Counsel can help preserve required materials, negotiate the scope, identify privileged information, and avoid an incomplete or overly broad production.
- Call a federal fraud lawyer serving New York before the investigation advances. A lawyer may be able to clarify your status, review government demands, and present information before prosecutors make final charging decisions.
Why Choose Combs Waterkotte for Federal Fraud Defense in New York?
Defending a federal fraud case in New York requires more than reading an indictment. Counsel must understand how the transaction worked, locate the records that restore context, prepare for federal court, and remember that a person’s liberty, career, and reputation sit behind every document.
- More than 80 years of combined legal experience: Our team has spent decades defending high-stakes cases in both federal and state courts.
- More than 10,000 cases handled and over one million jail days saved: That experience helps our team recognize where a government theory is overbroad, where an investigation has skipped steps, and where leverage may exist.
- More than 500 perfect Google reviews: Clients have trusted Combs Waterkotte during investigations and prosecutions carrying life-changing stakes.
- Early intervention: When brought in promptly, our lawyers can respond to agents, analyze formal demands, and look for opportunities to influence the case before indictment.
- A full defense team: The firm can assemble the personnel needed to organize records, investigate witnesses, understand digital evidence, and test financial claims.
- Trial preparation from the beginning: Every count is evaluated with trial in mind, even while the team pursues dismissal, pre-indictment advocacy, or a negotiated outcome. That readiness creates leverage throughout the case.
- Client-centered communication: Combs Waterkotte keeps clients informed about the evidence, choices, deadlines, and next steps. The team remains accessible when agents arrive or a new development cannot wait until business hours.
Our federal defense practice also covers:
Contact a Federal Fraud Defense Attorney in New York
Whether agents are still gathering evidence in New York or prosecutors have already obtained an indictment, the federal case will continue moving. Defense investigation, record preservation, and strategic preparation should begin now.
Call (314) 900-HELP to discuss the case during a free, confidential consultation, or contact Combs Waterkotte online.
