Federal Fraud Attorney Serving Lincoln, NE. A federal fraud investigation may be underway long before anyone calls it a criminal case. One company receives a subpoena. Someone else is asked about a payment. Funds are frozen, records are collected, and former employees are interviewed. When prosecutors finally reveal their theory, they may have already spent months assembling ordinary business documents into an accusation of intentional fraud.
That theory can look tidy because the government decides which records sit next to each other. The defense has to restore what was left out: the rest of the email thread, the work that was actually performed, the advice someone relied on, the pressure surrounding a business decision, and the difference between a venture that failed and a plan that was fraudulent from the beginning.
Cases Handled
Over 10,000
Jail Days Saved
Over 1 Million
Google Reviews
500+ Perfect
Legal Experience
Over 80 Years
Combs Waterkotte defends clients in Lincoln, NE and throughout the country against federal fraud allegations. Our clients include individuals, businesses, executives, licensed professionals, and health care providers. The firm’s federal criminal defense lawyers can communicate with agents and prosecutors, investigate before indictment, examine the evidence in context, file motions, negotiate, and prepare for trial or sentencing.
Discuss the investigation with Combs Waterkotte during a free, confidential case review. Call (314) 900-HELP or reach out online.
Free book
Facing Federal Criminal Charges? Why They’re Different and How to Win
Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense law firm, has handled over 10,000 cases successfully. This ebook guides you through the federal criminal defense process, how federal charges are different, and how to win.
This guide covers:
- the connections prosecutors use to pursue fraud as a federal crime;
- the federal fraud charges and companion offenses prosecutors commonly use;
- the major stages of a federal investigation and prosecution; and
- how Combs Waterkotte examines intent, witness credibility, searches, documentary proof, and disputed loss calculations.
Legal Videos
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed?
Can Federal Charges Be Reduced Or Dismissed? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek, lawyers with Combs Waterkotte, a leading federal criminal defense firm, talk about proffers, probation, and federal …
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense?
Should I Hire A Lawyer Experienced In Federal Defense? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek from the leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte discuss the importance of hiring a lawyer with …
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions?
What Penalties Apply To Federal Sex Crime Convictions? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs from Combs Waterkotte federal criminal defense firm discuss potential penalties related to federal sex crime …
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration?
Do Federal Sex Crimes Require Sex Offender Registration? Andrew Russek, a lawyer with leading federal criminal defense firm Combs Waterkotte, discusses the sex offender registry and federal sex …
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State?
What Makes A Sex Crime Federal Rather Than State? Andrew Russek and Chris Combs of Combs Waterkotte discuss factors that play into a sex crime being classified as federal, rather than …
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges?
What Are Federal Sex Crime Charges? Chris Combs and Andrew Russek of Combs Waterkotte discuss the most common federal sex crime charges. Interview Transcript Scott Michael Dunn: Well, let's …
What Gives Federal Courts Jurisdiction Over Fraud in Lincoln, NE?
There is no single charge called “federal fraud.” Prosecutors need a federal statute that covers the alleged conduct and gives the federal courts jurisdiction. The connection may come from the communication method, the institution involved, the source of the money, the type of program, or the reach of the alleged scheme.
A case can attract federal attention through allegations involving:
- interstate wires such as emails, texts, phone calls, online platforms, and electronic payments;
- the U.S. mail or a private interstate carrier;
- an allegation involving a federally protected bank, lender, or credit union;
- claims involving federal programs, contracts, grants, benefits, or emergency funding;
- regulated investment activity, market information, or the purchase and sale of covered financial products;
- an allegedly false certification, application, statement, or document presented to the federal government; or
- conduct spanning several states, countries, companies, accounts, or alleged participants.
Modern business in Lincoln, NE routinely uses interstate systems. An email server, card payment, wire transfer, or overnight package may supply the jurisdictional connection prosecutors need. It does not prove that anyone intended to defraud. The government must still establish the elements of the particular offense it charged.
Federal Fraud Charges Our Lincoln, NE Lawyers Defend
Federal charging decisions focus on the method of the alleged scheme, not merely the label people use for it. An internet fraud claim may become wire fraud. A billing dispute may produce health care fraud, false statement, or conspiracy counts. Combs Waterkotte represents people and organizations in Lincoln, NE in these and other federal white-collar cases.
- Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343: Accusations that an electronic communication or interstate transmission was used as part of an alleged plan to defraud another person or organization.
- Mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1341: Cases involving the U.S. mail or private carriers used in connection with an alleged scheme, including invoices, checks, applications, contracts, and account documents.
- Bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1344: Cases accusing someone of using deception to obtain bank property or of carrying out a scheme directed at a covered financial institution.
- Loan and credit application fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1014: Charges alleging that false information was knowingly supplied to influence a bank, lender, or federally connected credit decision.
- Health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1347: Investigations involving Medicare, Medicaid, private benefit programs, coding, medical necessity, referrals, prescriptions, kickbacks, or claims for services.
- Securities and commodities fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1348: Federal cases involving allegedly deceptive conduct in connection with securities, commodities, investments, market information, or investor funds.
- Government contract, grant, and benefit fraud: Cases involving federal contracts, grants, relief programs, benefits, procurement, eligibility representations, or invoices submitted for government money.
- Federal tax fraud and tax crimes: Investigations involving allegedly false returns, concealed income, sham deductions, payroll tax issues, or willful attempts to evade federal tax obligations.
- Access device fraud and computer fraud: Federal allegations based on the use of credit cards, account identifiers, digital credentials, devices, or computer access to obtain information, money, or property.
- Honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1346: Charges claiming that a person accepted or offered bribes or kickbacks and thereby deprived another party of the right to honest services.
Dozens of counts do not necessarily mean dozens of unrelated events. Prosecutors often divide one alleged scheme into separate communications and transactions. Defense strategy must examine what each count requires, which evidence supports it, and whether the broad accusation survives when its pieces are tested individually.
Federal court has its own procedures, prosecutors, judges, sentencing system, and local rules. Read more about what makes federal criminal cases different from state cases.
How Prosecutors Try to Prove Federal Fraud in Lincoln, NE
The government’s burden changes with the offense. A wire fraud charge has different elements from health care fraud, bank fraud, or false statements. Even so, federal fraud prosecutions tied to Lincoln, NE often turn on the same core issues:
- Can prosecutors prove the existence of the scheme described in the indictment, including its objective and operation?
- Can the government connect the accused to the alleged scheme with proof of knowing participation?
- Did the accused act with an intent to defraud rather than through mistake, negligence, confusion, or good faith?
- Was the representation actually false, and was it significant enough to affect the person or institution receiving it?
- Did the alleged conduct use or affect the mail, interstate wires, a financial institution, a federal program, or another required federal connection?
Warning Signs of a Federal Fraud Investigation in Lincoln, NE
An indictment is not the beginning of every federal fraud case. Frequently, the first warning arrives through a bank, employer, colleague, accountant, or business partner.
- A federal target letter, grand jury subpoena, or formal demand for testimony or documents arrived.
- Federal agents contacted you at home, at work, by phone, or through another person.
- Your employer, bank, accountant, customer, vendor, clinic, or business partner received a subpoena.
- Investigators arrived with a warrant and seized computers, phones, storage devices, documents, or business data.
- A financial institution restricted access to an account, or the government identified funds in a seizure or forfeiture notice.
- A matter that began as civil or administrative started examining intent, responsibility, and potentially false statements.
- Agents began questioning people around you, including colleagues, employees, customers, patients, investors, or family members.
- The government requested a voluntary interview or proffer, often presenting it as an opportunity to clear up a misunderstanding.
Even when the underlying allegation is disputed, an interview in Lincoln, NE can create new risk. Agents may compare each answer with documents they have already reviewed. Counsel can help determine whether to speak, what records matter, and how to avoid turning an uncertain recollection into a separate false-statement accusation.
Defending Against Federal Fraud Allegations in Lincoln, NE
A useful defense for clients in Lincoln, NE grows from the charged statute and the actual evidence. It may challenge the government’s entire theory or narrow a case count by count.
The Government Cannot Prove Intent
Fraud requires more than an error, a failed prediction, or a questionable business choice. Evidence that the accused sought professional advice, communicated openly, delivered value, or acted in good faith may show that deception was never the objective.
Prosecutors Presented an Incomplete Record
Prosecutors may rely on a narrow date range, one document version, or a fragment of a conversation. Defense investigation restores what came before and after, including missing communications and testimony from people who understood the process. The meaning of the evidence can shift once the complete record is visible.
The Government Mischaracterized the Statement
Not every discrepancy is a material lie. The defense can examine who supplied the information, what the words meant in context, whether the recipient relied on them, and whether an estimate was honestly made. Those questions may undercut both falsity and materiality.
The Defendant Was Not Part of the Alleged Plan
A person’s name may appear in records because that person performed a job, approved a routine payment, or received an email. None of those facts alone proves awareness of a fraudulent objective. Broad investigations can pull in employees and professionals who never joined the alleged scheme.
A Cooperating Witness Is Protecting Personal Interests
A witness may tell the government a story that protects a career, company, or plea agreement. Cross-examination and documentary evidence can reveal what the witness received, what changed over time, and where the account conflicts with the record.
The Alleged Conduct Does Not Fit the Federal Statute
Every federal fraud statute has boundaries. The government may need to prove a particular mailing, interstate wire, financial institution, federal program, or protected interest. If that connection is missing or does not match the charged conduct, the defense can challenge jurisdiction.
Evidence or Statements Were Obtained Unlawfully
A federal investigation does not eliminate constitutional limits. The defense can examine the warrant affidavit, the places searched, the data seized, and the circumstances of any interview. An unlawful search or statement may lead to suppression. More information is available in our guide to Fourth Amendment defenses.
Loss, Restitution, and Gain Require Independent Review
Fraud cases can change dramatically when the loss figure is corrected. The government’s calculation may ignore services delivered, money returned, collateral, credits, causation, or limits on jointly undertaken conduct. It may also attribute transactions to a defendant who neither caused nor agreed to them.
The Federal Fraud Case Process
Some matters arising in Lincoln, NE are resolved during the investigation; others continue through grand jury proceedings, court appearances, motions, and trial. A typical federal fraud case may include the following steps:
- Investigation: The case may begin with record demands, interviews, surveillance, search warrants, financial analysis, or cooperation from another person. Early defense work can clarify the client’s status and determine whether pre-indictment advocacy is possible.
- Grand jury proceedings: Grand jury proceedings allow prosecutors to seek records, question witnesses, and request an indictment. Defense counsel generally does not participate in the presentation, which makes preparation for subpoenaed testimony especially important.
- Initial appearance and release decision: Soon after the accused enters federal custody, the court determines whether release is appropriate and what conditions will apply while the case is pending.
- Arraignment and discovery: The accused enters a plea, and the defense begins receiving the government’s reports, exhibits, recordings, financial analyses, and digital evidence.
- Motions and expert review: Pretrial litigation can address unlawful searches, improperly obtained statements, charging defects, missing discovery, expert opinions, and evidence the government wants to present. Financial or technical experts may also test transactions and loss figures.
- Negotiation or trial preparation: The government and defense may explore a resolution, but preparation cannot pause. Counsel must evaluate plea terms and sentencing exposure while developing the factual themes and courtroom strategy needed for trial.
- Trial, sentencing, and appeal: At trial, the burden remains on the government to prove each charged element beyond a reasonable doubt. A plea or guilty verdict moves the case to sentencing, while appeal may be available for certain preserved errors and rulings.
Potential Penalties for Federal Fraud Charges
Federal fraud statutes carry serious maximum penalties, but the statutory maximum is not a prediction of the sentence for a person charged in Lincoln, NE. The charged counts, criminal history, advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines, facts found by the court, and the factors in federal sentencing law all affect the outcome.
| Charge or Companion Offense | Potential Statutory Penalty |
|---|---|
| Mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1341 | The ordinary statutory maximum is 20 years in prison, increasing to 30 years when the offense affects a financial institution or meets certain emergency-benefit provisions. |
| Wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1343 | Wire fraud is ordinarily punishable by as much as 20 years, with a possible 30-year ceiling under the statute’s specified financial institution or emergency-benefit provisions. |
| Bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1344 | A bank fraud conviction can carry up to 30 years in prison, along with a fine of as much as $1,000,000. |
| Health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1347 | Health care fraud generally carries up to 10 years in prison, with higher maximums of 20 years for serious bodily injury and life when death results. |
| Securities and commodities fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1348 | Potential exposure includes up to 25 years in prison plus any applicable fine, restitution, and forfeiture. |
| False statements, 18 U.S.C. 1001 | Generally up to five years in prison, with different exposure in certain matters identified by the statute. |
| Aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. 1028A | A conviction typically carries two years in prison consecutive to the punishment for the qualifying felony. |
| Fraud attempt or conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. 1349 | An attempt or conspiracy under Section 1349 carries the same punishment authorized for the underlying fraud offense. |
The advisory guideline analysis for many Lincoln, NE fraud cases begins under Section 2B1.1. Loss is often the largest dispute, but the court may also consider victim count, the defendant’s role, sophisticated means, abuse of trust, obstruction, acceptance, and relevant conduct.
Restitution and forfeiture are separate questions from guideline loss, even when the government uses similar numbers. The figures may differ. The court can also consider personal history, health, family responsibilities, conduct after the offense, and the need for a sentence that is sufficient without being greater than necessary.
Our related guides explain what happens at federal sentencing and whether a federal court can impose probation.
Federal Agents Asked About Fraud in Lincoln, NE: What Comes Next?
People often believe a quick conversation will make an unfounded suspicion disappear. Federal agents may instead use that conversation to compare recollections, lock in details, and identify inconsistencies.
- Pause before meeting with agents. You can respectfully decline the discussion and direct future contact through counsel.
- Never improvise an answer. Federal agents may compare every answer with records already in their possession. Remaining silent is safer than supplying information you cannot verify.
- Keep documents and devices intact. Implement careful preservation for paper records, accounts, messages, backups, and devices.
- Do not contact witnesses to coordinate explanations. A request to “get the story straight” can be characterized as witness tampering, even when that was not the sender’s purpose.
- Do not answer the allegation through a mass email. Company-wide explanations may reveal strategy, generate additional witnesses, and create statements prosecutors can quote.
- Save the complete government communication. Store the original materials safely and provide complete copies to counsel.
- Let counsel examine the demand before records are produced. A subpoena or court order cannot simply be ignored, but its scope, preservation duties, and available objections should be examined.
- Get federal defense counsel involved promptly in Lincoln, NE. A lawyer may be able to clarify your status, review government demands, and present information before prosecutors make final charging decisions.
Federal Fraud Defense for Clients in Lincoln, NE
A federal fraud defense team serving Lincoln, NE must be comfortable with dense records and high-stakes courtroom decisions. It also must understand the client’s work, priorities, and exposure. The financial story and the human story both matter.
- More than 80 years of combined legal experience: The firm’s lawyers bring decades of combined work in serious state and federal criminal cases.
- More than 10,000 cases handled and over one million jail days saved: A large body of casework creates practical pattern recognition, helping the defense identify unsupported assumptions, investigative gaps, and pressure points.
- More than 500 perfect Google reviews: Clients have trusted Combs Waterkotte during investigations and prosecutions carrying life-changing stakes.
- Early intervention: Before charges are filed, the firm can manage government contact, examine subpoenas, investigate the evidence, and determine whether information should be presented to prosecutors.
- A full defense team: Attorneys, paralegals, law clerks, investigators, and outside experts can be brought together around the financial, digital, and factual demands of the case.
- Trial preparation from the beginning: We examine counts and evidence as though they will be tested in court. That preparation strengthens motions, negotiations, cross-examination, and sentencing advocacy.
- Client-centered communication: Combs Waterkotte keeps clients informed about the evidence, choices, deadlines, and next steps. The team remains accessible when agents arrive or a new development cannot wait until business hours.
Combs Waterkotte also handles federal cases involving:
Get Help With Federal Fraud Charges in Lincoln, NE
Whether agents are still gathering evidence in Lincoln, NE or prosecutors have already obtained an indictment, the federal case will continue moving. Defense investigation, record preservation, and strategic preparation should begin now.
Call (314) 900-HELP or request a free, confidential consultation with Combs Waterkotte online.
